Crystallography: Difference between revisions

519 bytes added ,  15 November 2008
Line 66: Line 66:
* [[Test data sets]]
* [[Test data sets]]


== Crystallography versus NMR ==
== Understanding and extending the properties and limitations of crystallographic computations ==
=== Why is the final R-factor about 20% for macromolecules, but as low as 5% for small molecules? ===
# Burling et al. 1996
# DePriso et al. (2004) Structure 12, 831-838
 
=== Molecular dynamics and X-ray ===
# A comparison between molecular dynamics and X-ray results for dissociated CO in myoglobin. Vitkup D, Petsko GA, Karplus M. Nature Structural Biology  4, 202 - 208 (1997) [http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsb0397-202]
 
=== Crystallography versus NMR ===
A couple of papers analysing and comparing NMR and X-ray methods/structures:
A couple of papers analysing and comparing NMR and X-ray methods/structures:
# Science (1992), vol. 257, p. 961
# Science (1992), vol. 257, p. 961
# X-ray Crystallography and NMR: Complementary Views of Structure and Dynamics, Nature Structural Biology 4, 862-865 (1997). Preprint [http://atbweb.stanford.edu/scripts/papers.php?sendfile=162 available] from Axel Brunger's "publications" website.
# X-ray Crystallography and NMR: Complementary Views of Structure and Dynamics, Nature Structural Biology 4, 862-865 (1997). Preprint [http://atbweb.stanford.edu/scripts/papers.php?sendfile=162 available] from Axel Brunger's "publications" website.
# Traditional Biomolecular Structure Determination by NMR Spectroscopy Allows for Major Errors. S.B. Nabuurs, C.A.E.M. Spronk, G.W. Vuister, G. Vriend. PLoS Comput Biol 2(2): e9. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020009
# Traditional Biomolecular Structure Determination by NMR Spectroscopy Allows for Major Errors. S.B. Nabuurs, C.A.E.M. Spronk, G.W. Vuister, G. Vriend. PLoS Comput Biol 2(2): e9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020009
]
1,330

edits