1,330
edits
R-factors: Difference between revisions
→what kinds of problems exist with these indicators?
(→what kinds of problems exist with these indicators?: include table from Murshudov paper) |
|||
| Line 98: | Line 98: | ||
* R-values and [[pseudo-translation]]: if you have pseudotranslation you should be aware that even if you solve the structure by molecular replacement, starting R factors could be 70-80%. | * R-values and [[pseudo-translation]]: if you have pseudotranslation you should be aware that even if you solve the structure by molecular replacement, starting R factors could be 70-80%. | ||
* data R-values are not meaningful at high resolution. This is discussed by [http://strucbio.biologie.uni-konstanz.de//strucbio/files/karplus2012_science.pdf Karplus and Diederichs (2012) "Linking crystallographic data and model quality". ''Science'' '''336''', 1030] | |||
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||