R-factors: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== Definitions == | == Definitions == | ||
=== Data quality indicators === | === Data quality indicators === | ||
* R<sub>sym</sub> and R<sub>merge</sub> : the formula is | * R<sub>sym</sub> and R<sub>merge</sub> : the formula for both is | ||
<math> | <math> | ||
R = \frac{\sum_{hkl}\vert I_{hkl}-\langle I_{hkl}\rangle\vert}{\sum_{hkl}I_{hkl}} | |||
</math> | </math> | ||
<br> | |||
<br> | |||
where <math>\langle I_{hkl}\rangle</math> is the average of symmetry- (or Friedel-) related observations of a unique reflection, and the summation is over all observations, leaving out those that have no symmetry mates (or Friedel) in the dataset. | |||
* Redundancy-independant version of the above: R<sub>meas</sub> | * Redundancy-independant version of the above: R<sub>meas</sub> | ||
* measuring quality of averaged intensities/amplitudes: R<sub>p.i.m.</sub> and R<sub>mrgd-F</sub> | * measuring quality of averaged intensities/amplitudes: R<sub>p.i.m.</sub> and R<sub>mrgd-F</sub> | ||
=== Model quality indicators === | === Model quality indicators === | ||
* R and R<sub>free</sub> : the formula is ( | * R and R<sub>free</sub> : the formula for both is | ||
<math> | |||
R=\frac{\sum_{hkl_{unique}}\vert F_{hkl}^{(obs)}-F_{hkl}^{(calc)}\vert}{\sum_{hkl_{unique}} F_{hkl}^{(obs)}} | |||
</math> | |||
<br> | |||
<br> | |||
where <math>F_{hkl}^{(obs)}</math> and <math>F_{hkl}^{(calc)}</math> have to be scaled w.r.t. each other. R and R<sub>free</sub> differ in the set of reflections they are calculated from: R is calculated for the [[working set]], whereas R<sub>free</sub> is calculated for the [[test set]]. | |||
== what do R-factors try to measure, and how to interpret their values? == | == what do R-factors try to measure, and how to interpret their values? == | ||
* relative deviation of | * relative deviation of | ||
Revision as of 15:05, 14 February 2008
Historically, R-factors were introduced by ...
Definitions
Data quality indicators
- Rsym and Rmerge : the formula for both is
[math]\displaystyle{
R = \frac{\sum_{hkl}\vert I_{hkl}-\langle I_{hkl}\rangle\vert}{\sum_{hkl}I_{hkl}}
}[/math]
where [math]\displaystyle{ \langle I_{hkl}\rangle }[/math] is the average of symmetry- (or Friedel-) related observations of a unique reflection, and the summation is over all observations, leaving out those that have no symmetry mates (or Friedel) in the dataset.
- Redundancy-independant version of the above: Rmeas
- measuring quality of averaged intensities/amplitudes: Rp.i.m. and Rmrgd-F
Model quality indicators
- R and Rfree : the formula for both is
[math]\displaystyle{
R=\frac{\sum_{hkl_{unique}}\vert F_{hkl}^{(obs)}-F_{hkl}^{(calc)}\vert}{\sum_{hkl_{unique}} F_{hkl}^{(obs)}}
}[/math]
where [math]\displaystyle{ F_{hkl}^{(obs)} }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ F_{hkl}^{(calc)} }[/math] have to be scaled w.r.t. each other. R and Rfree differ in the set of reflections they are calculated from: R is calculated for the working set, whereas Rfree is calculated for the test set.
what do R-factors try to measure, and how to interpret their values?
- relative deviation of
Data quality
- typical values: ...
Model quality
what kind of problems exist with these indicators?
- (Rsym / Rmerge ) should not be used, Rmeas should be used instead (explain why ?)
- R/Rfree and NCS: reflections in work and test set are not independant