1,330
edits
R-factors: Difference between revisions
→what kinds of problems exist with these indicators?
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 67: | Line 67: | ||
== what kinds of problems exist with these indicators? == | == what kinds of problems exist with these indicators? == | ||
- (R<sub>sym</sub> / R<sub>merge</sub> ) should not be used, R<sub>meas</sub> should be used instead | - (R<sub>sym</sub> / R<sub>merge</sub> ) should not be used to judge [[data quality]], R<sub>meas</sub> should be used instead. The reason is that the former depend on multiplicity, whereas the latter doesn't. | ||
- R/R<sub>free</sub> and NCS: reflections in work and test set are not | - R/R<sub>free</sub> and NCS: reflections in work and test set are not independent if chosen randomly. It is better to choose the test set reflections in thin resolution shells (FIXME: references and programs for this). | ||
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||