Coot: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→make RSR in coot 0.8.1 behave like in earlier versions: Molprobity not active in COOT) |
(remove some obsolete stuff) |
||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
==== Example: installing a 64bit nightly CentOS5 binary build on 64bit SL6.1 ==== | ==== Example: installing a 64bit nightly CentOS5 binary build on 64bit SL6.1 ==== | ||
First of all, SL (Scientific Linux) is a derivative of RHEL, as is CentOS. So all three OSs behave exactly the same. | First of all, SL (Scientific Linux) is a derivative of RHEL, as is CentOS. So all three OSs behave exactly the same. | ||
The binaries with "x86_64" binaries are for 64bit systems; the "i386" binaries are for 32bit systems. Since my notebook is 64bits ("uname -a" reports "x86_64" more than once), I download | The binaries with "x86_64" binaries are for 64bit systems; the "i386" binaries are for 32bit systems. Since my notebook is 64bits ("uname -a" reports "x86_64" more than once), I download coot-0.7-pre-1-revision-3999-binary-Linux-x86_64-centos-5-python-gtk2.tar.gz. As root, I "cd /usr/local/src" and un-tar. Next, have to find out which libraries are missing. This can be achieved by (''note the use of LD_LIBRARY_PATH in the second command - do not permanently modify LD_LIBRARY_PATH !''): | ||
[root@localhost]# cd coot-Linux-x86_64-centos-5-gtk2-python | [root@localhost]# cd coot-Linux-x86_64-centos-5-gtk2-python | ||
[root@localhost]# LD_LIBRARY_PATH=lib ldd bin/coot-real | grep found | [root@localhost]# LD_LIBRARY_PATH=lib ldd bin/coot-real | grep found | ||
Line 75: | Line 75: | ||
and make it executable with | and make it executable with | ||
chmod a+x /usr/local/bin/coot | chmod a+x /usr/local/bin/coot | ||
=== Installation from source code via autobuild scripts === | === Installation from source code via autobuild scripts === |