2,652
edits
Wishlist: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
→Would be nice to have
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
== Would be nice to have == | == Would be nice to have == | ||
* A breakdown of R<sub>meas</sub> by frame number, as currently only available from [[XDSSTAT]]. --[[User:Kay|Kay]] 14:00, 12 November 2007 (CET) | * A breakdown of R<sub>meas</sub> by frame number, as currently only available from [[XDSSTAT]]. This would be useful in order to identify bad frames. --[[User:Kay|Kay]] 14:00, 12 November 2007 (CET) | ||
* Templates of XDS.INP currently have | * Templates of XDS.INP currently have | ||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
--[[User:Kay|Kay]] 14:30, 12 November 2007 (CET) | --[[User:Kay|Kay]] 14:30, 12 November 2007 (CET) | ||
* IDXREF should respect INCLUDE_RESOLUTION_RANGE= because this could be used to prevent ice rings from disturbing the indexing. Likewise, EXCLUDE_RESOLUTION_RANGE= should be respected | * IDXREF should respect INCLUDE_RESOLUTION_RANGE= because this could be used to prevent ice rings from disturbing the indexing. Drawback: one would have to change INCLUDE_RESOLUTION_RANGE= after running IDXREF.<br />Likewise, EXCLUDE_RESOLUTION_RANGE= should be respected. Drawback: geometrical parameters are unrefined when resolution is calculated in IDXREF.<br /> A currently possible, but ugly, workaround is to set TRUSTED_REGION=0 <some small value> for INIT where <some small value> is calculated such that ice rings are excluded. Drawbacks: a) <some small value> needs to be calculated by Bragg's law. b) after successful indexing, INIT needs to be re-run.<br /> Based on discussion with Clemens Vonrhein --[[User:Kay|Kay]] 12:16, 16 November 2007 (CET) | ||
== Cosmetical == | == Cosmetical == | ||