2,684
edits
Ice rings: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
(update with "pitfall") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
* Please see [[Wishlist#Would be nice to have]]: there's a list of additional (high-) resolution ranges one might want to exclude (in [[CORRECT]]). | * Please see [[Wishlist#Would be nice to have]]: there's a list of additional (high-) resolution ranges one might want to exclude (in [[CORRECT]]). | ||
* A currently possible way to prevent ice rings from spoiling the [[IDXREF]] step is to set "TRUSTED_REGION=0 X" for INIT, where X is calculated such that ice rings are excluded. Using Bragg's law and an approximation, we find that <br /> X = <math>\frac{Wavelength \cdot Distance} { | * A currently possible way to prevent ice rings from spoiling the [[IDXREF]] step is to set "TRUSTED_REGION=0 X" for INIT, where X is calculated such that ice rings are excluded. Using Bragg's law and an approximation, we find that <br /> X = <math>\frac{Wavelength \cdot Distance} {4 \cdot NX \cdot QX}</math> should give approx. 4 Å cutoff, which should exclude all ice rings. <br /> Drawback: after successful indexing, INIT needs to be re-run with "TRUSTED_REGION=0 1.05" or so. | ||
A potential pitfall: the above assumes that the direct beam position is near the middle of the detector. | A potential pitfall: the above assumes that the direct beam position is near the middle of the detector. | ||
* Please see [[Optimization]] for how to treat remaining ice reflections showing up as "aliens" in [[CORRECT.LP]]. | * Please see [[Optimization]] for how to treat remaining ice reflections showing up as "aliens" in [[CORRECT.LP]]. | ||