2,684
edits
(Brazil's MX2 beamline at LNLS) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
* Taiwanese synchrotron (ADSC Q315R, SN 930), 2015 : ROTATION_AXIS=1 0 0 whereas in 2010 it was -1 0 0 | * Taiwanese synchrotron (ADSC Q315R, SN 930), 2015 : ROTATION_AXIS=1 0 0 whereas in 2010 it was -1 0 0 | ||
* BM14 (ESRF; Mar CCD, as of April 2014) has X and Y reversed in the header. [[Generate_XDS.INP]] | * BM14 (ESRF; Mar CCD, as of April 2014) has X and Y reversed in the header. [[Generate_XDS.INP]] implements this reversal since version 0.75 . | ||
* BM30A (ESRF, ADSC) has ROTATION_AXIS=-1 0 0 (implemented in [[generate_XDS.INP]] on 2016-10-02) | * BM30A (ESRF, ADSC) has ROTATION_AXIS=-1 0 0 (implemented in [[generate_XDS.INP]] on 2016-10-02) | ||
* Diamond I24 (PILATUS3 6M, S/N 60-0119) moved from horizontal to vertical spindle for cryo data collection. If the CBF header has <code># Oscillation_axis X.CW +SLOW</code> then one needs ROTATION_AXIS=0 -1 0 . Supported by [[generate_XDS.INP]] since version 0.70 . | * Diamond I24 (PILATUS3 6M, S/N 60-0119) moved from horizontal to vertical spindle for cryo data collection. If the CBF header has <code># Oscillation_axis X.CW +SLOW</code> then one needs ROTATION_AXIS=0 -1 0 . Supported by [[generate_XDS.INP]] since version 0.70 . | ||
* PETRA P14 also needs ROTATION_AXIS=0 -1 0 | * PETRA P14 also needs ROTATION_AXIS=0 -1 0 | ||
* ALS 8.2.2 recent (Nov 2015) evidence indicates that the same beam center convention is used as for ESRF, PF, APS Argonne BLs. | * ALS 8.2.2 recent (Nov 2015) evidence indicates that the same beam center convention is used as for ESRF, PF, APS Argonne BLs. | ||
* Shanghai synchrotron Radiation Facility seems to need ROTATION_AXIS=-1 0 0 | * Shanghai synchrotron Radiation Facility seems to need ROTATION_AXIS=-1 0 0. This is not yet in [[generate_XDS.INP]]. | ||
* Brazil's MX2 beamline at LNLS needs ROTATION_AXIS=-1 0 0 (since May 18, 2017 - before that it was 1 0 0) | * Brazil's MX2 beamline at LNLS needs ROTATION_AXIS=-1 0 0 (since May 18, 2017 - before that it was 1 0 0) |