Quality Control: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This is an attempt of putting together a number of datasets with different characteristics (high and low resolution, good and bad crystals, untwinned and twinned), their evaluation with different versions of XDS, and the determination of the quality of the resulting data using refinement and phasing. | This is an attempt of putting together a number of datasets with different characteristics (high and low resolution, good and bad crystals, untwinned and twinned), their evaluation with different versions of XDS, and the determination of the quality of the resulting data using refinement and phasing. | ||
The goal of this project is to find generally optimal parameters for XDS data reduction, to monitor the progress of the program, and to discover bugs or regressions. | The goal of this project is to find generally optimal parameters for XDS data reduction, to monitor the progress of the program, and to discover bugs or regressions. | ||
I'm currently working with Qingping Xu on identifying suitable datasets in the (publicly accessible!) JCSG dataset archive. | |||
Revision as of 22:49, 23 January 2008
This is an attempt of putting together a number of datasets with different characteristics (high and low resolution, good and bad crystals, untwinned and twinned), their evaluation with different versions of XDS, and the determination of the quality of the resulting data using refinement and phasing. The goal of this project is to find generally optimal parameters for XDS data reduction, to monitor the progress of the program, and to discover bugs or regressions. I'm currently working with Qingping Xu on identifying suitable datasets in the (publicly accessible!) JCSG dataset archive.
PulG (good 2-wavelength MAD data @ 2.8 A)
Raw data: ftp://turn5.biologie.uni-konstanz.de/pub/datasets/
Reference: Köhler, R., Schäfer, K., Müller, S., Vignon, G., Diederichs, K., Philippsen, A., Ringler, P., Pugsley, A.P., Engel, A., Welte, W. (2004) Structure and assembly of the pseudopilin PulG. Molecular Microbiology 54, 647-664. [1]
XDS.INP for remote high data
JOB=XYCORR INIT COLSPOT IDXREF DEFPIX INTEGRATE CORRECT ! for this experiment: ORGX=1031 ORGY=1001 DETECTOR_DISTANCE=220 OSCILLATION_RANGE=1 X-RAY_WAVELENGTH=0.97857 NAME_TEMPLATE_OF_DATA_FRAMES=images/pulg_semet_D22_2_???.img DIRECT TIFF DATA_RANGE=5 124 SPOT_RANGE=5 124 BACKGROUND_RANGE=5 14 SPACE_GROUP_NUMBER=179 UNIT_CELL_CONSTANTS= 85.5 85.5 145.2 90 90 120 FRIEDEL'S_LAW=FALSE STRICT_ABSORPTION_CORRECTION=TRUE ! parameters with changes wrt default values: VALUE_RANGE_FOR_TRUSTED_DETECTOR_PIXELS=8000. 30000. TRUSTED_REGION=0. 0.99 MINIMUM_ZETA=0.05 INCLUDE_RESOLUTION_RANGE=50 0 STRONG_PIXEL=6 REFINE(INTEGRATE)=CELL BEAM ORIENTATION ! parameters specifically for this detector and beamline: NX=2048 NY=2048 QX=0.079092 QY=0.079092 !MARCCD 165mm version DETECTOR=CCDCHESS MINIMUM_VALID_PIXEL_VALUE=0 OVERLOAD=65000 DIRECTION_OF_DETECTOR_X-AXIS=1 0 0 DIRECTION_OF_DETECTOR_Y-AXIS=0 1 0 INCIDENT_BEAM_DIRECTION=0 0 1 ROTATION_AXIS=1 0 0 FRACTION_OF_POLARIZATION=0.99 POLARIZATION_PLANE_NORMAL=0 1 0
XDS.INP for inflection point data
same as above, except
X-RAY_WAVELENGTH=0.97972 NAME_TEMPLATE_OF_DATA_FRAMES=images/pulg_semet_D22_3_???.img DIRECT TIFF DATA_RANGE=1 120 SPOT_RANGE=1 120 BACKGROUND_RANGE=1 10