2,684
edits
VIEW: Difference between revisions
m
no edit summary
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
If the integration has worked as it should, the following should be true: | If the integration has worked as it should, the following should be true: | ||
* most (if not all) observed reflections are encircled by thin lines (corresponding to integration areas) | |||
* empty integration areas belong to weak reflections | |||
* reflections without integration area are partial reflections, whose center is on an adjacent frame | |||
Note: the pixel numbering in VIEW goes from 0 to NX-1 (similar for y), whereas XDS using a numbering of 1 to NX (NY). Thus, if you find out a position on the detector (e.g. the direct beam) by using VIEW, you should add 1 in both x and y if you want to put the numbers into [[XDS.INP]]. | Note: the pixel numbering in VIEW goes from 0 to NX-1 (similar for y), whereas XDS using a numbering of 1 to NX (NY). Thus, if you find out a position on the detector (e.g. the direct beam) by using VIEW, you should add 1 in both x and y if you want to put the numbers into [[XDS.INP]]. | ||
VIEW -h gives a short help output with options, VIEW -hv shows a short manual. | VIEW -h gives a short help output with options, VIEW -hv shows a short manual. | ||