2,684
edits
FAQ: Difference between revisions
→You said that the XDS deals with high mosaicity. How high mosaicity is still manageable?
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 126: | Line 126: | ||
I don't have exact numbers. Maybe up to ten degrees? | I don't have exact numbers. Maybe up to ten degrees? | ||
By the way, mosaicity is defined by XDS as the sigma of a Gaussian representing a reflection's rocking curve. The relation between full-width-half-maximum (FWHM, used by MOSFLM for mosaicity definition) and sigma is: FWHM = sigma*2.355 . In other words, if MOSFLM reports a mosaicity of 0.47° and XDS reports 0.2°, then the two programs agree in their opinion about the rocking curve. | |||
=== Could you give recommendation for MAD data processing, to get best anomalous?? How to process the 3 data sets with the same orientation matrix, should we use reference datataset? === | === Could you give recommendation for MAD data processing, to get best anomalous?? How to process the 3 data sets with the same orientation matrix, should we use reference datataset? === | ||