2,684
edits
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Round 1: processing the data, and determining the space group == | |||
Using | |||
<pre> | |||
#!/bin/bash -f | |||
for f in `seq 1 100`; | |||
do | |||
export OUT=wedge0`printf "%03d" $f` | |||
export NAMES="$PWD/Illuin/microfocus/xtal"`printf "%03d" $f`"_1_00\?.img" | |||
rm -rf $OUT | |||
mkdir $OUT | |||
cd $OUT | |||
generate_XDS.INP $NAMES | |||
sed -i s"/SPOT_RANGE=1 1/SPOT_RANGE=1 3/" XDS.INP | |||
sed -i s"/SPACE_GROUP_NUMBER=0/SPACE_GROUP_NUMBER=1/" XDS.INP | |||
sed -i s"/UNIT_CELL_CONSTANTS= 70 80 90/UNIT_CELL_CONSTANTS=38.3 79.1 79.1/" XDS.INP | |||
sed -i s"/TRUSTED_REGION=0.0 1.2/TRUSTED_REGION=0 1/" XDS.INP | |||
sed -i s"/INCLUDE_RESOLUTION_RANGE=50 0/INCLUDE_RESOLUTION_RANGE=99 1.8/" XDS.INP | |||
/usr/local/bin/xds_par | |||
cd .. | |||
done | |||
mkdir xscale | |||
cd xscale | |||
cat >XSCALE.INP <<eof | |||
SPACE_GROUP_NUMBER= 1 | |||
UNIT_CELL_CONSTANTS= 38.3 79.1 79.1 90 90 90 | |||
OUTPUT_FILE=temp.ahkl | |||
SAVE_CORRECTION_IMAGES=FALSE | |||
FRIEDEL'S_LAW=TRUE | |||
eof | |||
find $PWD/../wedge* -name XDS_ASCII.HKL | awk '{print "INPUT_FILE=",$0;print "NBATCH=1 CORRECTIONS=DECAY"}' >> XSCALE.INP | |||
</pre> | |||
<pre> | <pre> | ||
SUBSET OF INTENSITY DATA WITH SIGNAL/NOISE >= -3.0 AS FUNCTION OF RESOLUTION | SUBSET OF INTENSITY DATA WITH SIGNAL/NOISE >= -3.0 AS FUNCTION OF RESOLUTION | ||
Line 114: | Line 146: | ||
yields a iso.pdb which is far from a single cluster; it is a severely elongated single cloud. We must now investigate whether the data have lower than tetragonal symmetry. | yields a iso.pdb which is far from a single cluster; it is a severely elongated single cloud. We must now investigate whether the data have lower than tetragonal symmetry. | ||
XSCALEing with | XSCALEing with | ||
SPACE_GROUP_NUMBER= | SPACE_GROUP_NUMBER=16 | ||
UNIT_CELL_CONSTANTS=38.3 79.1 79.1 90 90 90 | UNIT_CELL_CONSTANTS=38.3 79.1 79.1 90 90 90 | ||
gives a new temp.ahkl, with orthorhombic symmetry. | gives a new temp.ahkl, with orthorhombic symmetry. | ||
Line 155: | Line 187: | ||
1.80 7927 1570 1701 92.3% 104.8% 225.2% 7811 0.70 116.1% 42.6* -5 0.425 785 | 1.80 7927 1570 1701 92.3% 104.8% 225.2% 7811 0.70 116.1% 42.6* -5 0.425 785 | ||
total 130885 22874 23173 98.7% 38.3% 41.0% 130103 2.77 42.1% 92.0* 3 0.703 13546 | total 130885 22874 23173 98.7% 38.3% 41.0% 130103 2.77 42.1% 92.0* 3 0.703 13546 | ||
At this point, we run | |||
xdscc12 -w XSCALE.1.HKL | grep ^a | sort -nk6 | |||
and find that data sets 1 and 17 are wrongly included in the cloud of 51 data sets. Thus they are removed manually from XSCALE.INP. | |||
We then re-run XSCALE with MERGE=TRUE. The resulting XSCALE.1.HKL is then used as REFERENCE_DATA_SET for a second round of integration with XDS. | |||
pointless xdsin XSCALE.1.HKL | |||
gives | |||
<pre> | |||
Spacegroup TotProb SysAbsProb Reindex Conditions | |||
P 21 21 21 ( 19) 0.896 0.924 h00: h=2n, 0k0: k=2n, 00l: l=2n (zones 1,2,3) | |||
.......... | |||
P 2 21 21 ( 18) 0.044 0.045 0k0: k=2n, 00l: l=2n (zones 2,3) | |||
.......... | |||
P 21 21 2 ( 18) 0.015 0.015 h00: h=2n, 0k0: k=2n (zones 1,2) | |||
.......... | |||
P 21 2 21 ( 18) 0.014 0.014 h00: h=2n, 00l: l=2n (zones 1,3) | |||
--------------------------------------------------------------- | |||
Space group confidence (= Sqrt(Score * (Score - NextBestScore))) = 0.87 | |||
Laue group confidence (= Sqrt(Score * (Score - NextBestScore))) = 0.97 | |||
Selecting space group P 21 21 21 as there is a single space group with the highest score | |||
<!--SUMMARY_BEGIN--> $TEXT:Result: $$ $$ | |||
Best Solution: space group P 21 21 21 | |||
Reindex operator: [h,k,l] | |||
Laue group probability: 0.970 | |||
Systematic absence probability: 0.924 | |||
Total probability: 0.896 | |||
Space group confidence: 0.874 | |||
Laue group confidence 0.966 | |||
Unit cell: 38.30 79.10 79.10 90.00 90.00 90.00 | |||
79.10 to 2.47 - Resolution range used for Laue group search | |||
79.10 to 1.80 - Resolution range in file, used for systematic absence check | |||
</pre> | |||
== Round 2: using the REFERENCE_DATA_SET == | |||
The processing script integrate.rc is changed a bit: | |||
#!/bin/bash -f | |||
for f in `seq 1 100`; | |||
do | |||
export OUT=wedge0`printf "%03d" $f` | |||
export NAMES="$PWD/Illuin/microfocus/xtal"`printf "%03d" $f`"_1_00\?.img" | |||
rm -rf $OUT | |||
mkdir $OUT | |||
cd $OUT | |||
generate_XDS.INP $NAMES | |||
echo REFERENCE_DATA_SET=../reference.hkl >> XDS.INP | |||
echo MINIMUM_I/SIGMA=50 >>XDS.INP | |||
sed -i s"/SPOT_RANGE=1 1/SPOT_RANGE=1 3/" XDS.INP | |||
sed -i s"/SPACE_GROUP_NUMBER=0/SPACE_GROUP_NUMBER=19/" XDS.INP | |||
sed -i s"/UNIT_CELL_CONSTANTS= 70 80 90/UNIT_CELL_CONSTANTS=38.3 79.1 79.1/" XDS.INP | |||
sed -i s"/TRUSTED_REGION=0.0 1.2/TRUSTED_REGION=0 1/" XDS.INP | |||
sed -i s"/INCLUDE_RESOLUTION_RANGE=50 0/INCLUDE_RESOLUTION_RANGE=99 1.8/" XDS.INP | |||
/usr/local/bin/xds_par | |||
cd .. | |||
done | |||
mkdir xscale | |||
cd xscale | |||
cat >XSCALE.INP <<eof | |||
SPACE_GROUP_NUMBER= 19 | |||
UNIT_CELL_CONSTANTS= 38.3 79.1 79.1 90 90 90 | |||
OUTPUT_FILE=temp.ahkl | |||
SAVE_CORRECTION_IMAGES=FALSE | |||
eof | |||
find $PWD/../wedge* -name XDS_ASCII.HKL | awk '{print "INPUT_FILE=",$0;print "NBATCH=3 CORRECTIONS=ALL"}' >> XSCALE.INP | |||
and we get as XSCALE.LP : | |||
<pre> | |||
NOTE: Friedel pairs are treated as different reflections. | |||
SUBSET OF INTENSITY DATA WITH SIGNAL/NOISE >= -3.0 AS FUNCTION OF RESOLUTION | |||
RESOLUTION NUMBER OF REFLECTIONS COMPLETENESS R-FACTOR R-FACTOR COMPARED I/SIGMA R-meas CC(1/2) Anomal SigAno Nano | |||
LIMIT OBSERVED UNIQUE POSSIBLE OF DATA observed expected Corr | |||
8.04 2960 473 476 99.4% 6.2% 5.5% 2955 29.90 6.7% 99.8* 86* 2.824 166 | |||
5.68 5486 890 894 99.6% 4.9% 5.9% 5478 27.38 5.3% 99.7* 86* 2.384 363 | |||
4.64 6934 1136 1138 99.8% 4.9% 5.8% 6918 27.64 5.4% 99.8* 76* 1.829 480 | |||
4.02 8066 1363 1367 99.7% 5.3% 5.9% 8045 26.67 5.9% 99.6* 57* 1.426 590 | |||
3.59 9121 1535 1539 99.7% 6.1% 6.3% 9092 25.58 6.7% 99.6* 50* 1.298 666 | |||
3.28 10222 1690 1694 99.8% 6.8% 6.8% 10203 24.69 7.5% 99.4* 36* 1.204 751 | |||
3.04 10990 1831 1834 99.8% 8.5% 8.0% 10970 21.40 9.3% 99.3* 22* 1.086 827 | |||
2.84 12065 1993 1999 99.7% 11.2% 11.1% 12038 17.68 12.2% 99.0* 24* 1.085 894 | |||
2.68 12771 2120 2124 99.8% 14.7% 15.1% 12738 14.78 16.1% 98.4* 14* 0.960 952 | |||
2.54 13054 2196 2198 99.9% 18.9% 20.2% 13026 12.53 20.8% 97.7* 13* 0.867 995 | |||
2.42 14290 2372 2375 99.9% 24.9% 27.1% 14261 10.34 27.3% 96.1* 6 0.813 1083 | |||
2.32 14704 2432 2438 99.8% 29.8% 32.5% 14676 9.21 32.6% 95.1* 8 0.843 1115 | |||
2.23 15623 2582 2593 99.6% 33.0% 35.0% 15587 8.83 36.1% 93.0* 6 0.831 1180 | |||
2.15 15732 2610 2613 99.9% 37.1% 39.2% 15697 8.10 40.6% 91.0* 8 0.818 1203 | |||
2.08 16782 2788 2795 99.7% 44.1% 47.0% 16741 7.01 48.3% 88.3* 4 0.797 1276 | |||
2.01 16783 2802 2809 99.8% 46.8% 48.7% 16747 6.54 51.2% 89.5* 3 0.807 1293 | |||
1.95 18262 3043 3051 99.7% 56.5% 58.0% 18221 5.61 61.9% 85.9* 0 0.803 1402 | |||
1.89 17810 2979 2988 99.7% 68.3% 69.8% 17769 4.63 74.8% 80.0* 7 0.864 1374 | |||
1.84 18503 3112 3117 99.8% 87.5% 90.3% 18454 3.55 96.0% 69.6* 3 0.838 1435 | |||
1.80 16130 2988 3185 93.8% 101.2% 110.5% 15959 2.77 111.7% 62.9* 2 0.798 1276 | |||
total 256288 42935 43227 99.3% 13.4% 14.0% 255575 11.63 14.6% 99.6* 21* 0.975 19321 | |||
</pre> | |||
The structure can now easily be solved with hkl2map: |