Xdscc12: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
</pre> | </pre> | ||
== | == Fcalc with anomalous signal as reference == | ||
A simple way to obtain Fcalc(+) and Fcalc(-) is to run <code>phenix.refine</code> with options (in case of S as anomalous scatterer) | |||
refinement.input.xray_data.labels="F(+),SIGF(+),F(-),SIGF(-),merged" | refinement.input.xray_data.labels="F(+),SIGF(+),F(-),SIGF(-),merged" | ||
refinement.refine.anomalous_scatterers.group.selection="element S" | refinement.refine.anomalous_scatterers.group.selection="element S" | ||
Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
and then | and then | ||
<pre> | <pre> | ||
sftools | sftools <<eof | ||
read mymodel_001.mtz | read mymodel_001.mtz | ||
write | write anom-reference.hkl format(3i5,2f10.3) col "F-model(+)" "F-model(-)" | ||
y | y | ||
quit | quit | ||
eof | |||
</pre> | </pre> | ||
sftools | in which case <code>sftools</code> outputs only the acentric reflections - only those have anomalous differences. <code>XDSCC12</code> then has to be run with the <code>-s -r anom-reference.hkl</code> option. This allows a direct comparison of CC Iobs-Icalc, with Icalc either as (Fcalc(+) + Fcalc(-))/2 (these are the output lines starting with r) or with Iobs(+) being compared with Fcalc(+)<sup>2</sup>, and Iobs(-) being compared with Fcalc(-)<sup>2</sup> (output lines starting with s). Preliminary insight: the r and s lines do not differ significantly. |
Revision as of 11:30, 26 November 2018
XDSCC12 is a program for generating delta-CC1/2 and delta-CC1/2ano values for XDS_ASCII.HKL (written by XDS), or for XSCALE.HKL containing several files of type XDS_ASCII.HKL after scaling in XSCALE (with MERGE=FALSE).
It implements the method described in Assmann, Brehm and Diederichs (2016) Identification of rogue datasets in serial crystallography. J. Appl. Cryst. 49, 1021 [1], and it does this not only for the individual datasets in XSCALE.HKL, but also for individual frames, or groups of frames, of a single dataset collected with the rotation method and processed by XDS.
The program can be downloaded for Linux 64bit or Mac.
Usage (this text can be obtained with xdscc12 -h
):
xdscc12 KD 2018-9-6. Academic use only; no redistribution. -h option shows options. Please cite Assmann, G., Brehm, W., Diederichs, K. (2016) J.Appl.Cryst. 49, 1021-1028 usage: xdscc12 [-dmin <lowres>] [-dmax <highres>] [-nbin <nbin>] [-mode <1 or 2>] [-<abcdeftwz>] [-r <ref>] FILE_NAME dmax (default 999A), dmin (default 1A) and nbin (default 10) have the usual meanings. mode can be 1 (equal volumes of resolution shells) or 2 (increasing volumes; default). -t: total oscillation (degree) to batch fine-sliced frames into -r: next parameter: ASCII reference file with lines: h,k,l,Fcalc FILE_NAME can be XDS or XSCALE reflection file other options can be combined (e.g. -def), and switch the following off: -a: individual isomorphous summary values -b: individual (Fisher-transformed) delta-CC1/2 values -c: individual delta-CC1/2 reflection numbers -d: individual anomalous summary values -e: individual (Fisher-transformed) delta-CC1/2ano values -f: individual delta-CC1/2ano reflection numbers -w: weighting of intensities with their sigmas -z: no Fisher transformation of delta-CC1/2 values
The program output is terse but supposed to be self-explanatory. The isomorphous delta-CC1/2 of a batch of frames (width chosen with the -t option) relative to all data is most easily visualized via XDSGUI (Statistics tab); the anomalous delta-CC1/2 may be plotted with e.g. gnuplot after grepping the relevant lines from the output.
For multiple datasets, the output lines show the contribution of each dataset toward the total CC1/2. Negative numbers indicate a worsening of the overall signal.
Statistics are given (in resolution shells) for the isomorphous and the anomalous signal.
Important: to identify outliers in XSCALEd data, you should use the -w option. Otherwise, a and b are adjusted such that the sigmas are very high, which reduces the delta-CC1/2 signal.
A complete description of how to process serial crystallography data with XDS/XSCALE is given in SSX. A program that implements the method of Brehm and Diederichs (2014) and theory of Diederichs (2017) is xscale_isocluster.
Preparing a reference data set
If the refinement was done with phenix.refine, one could use
mtz2various hklin 2bn3_refine_001.mtz hklout temp.hkl <<eof OUTPUT USER * LABIN FC=F-model PHIC=PHIF-model END eof
- the column corresponding to PHIC will not be used by xdscc12. Alternatively,
sftools read mymodel_001.mtz write temp.hkl format(3i5,f10.3) col F-model y quit
Fcalc with anomalous signal as reference
A simple way to obtain Fcalc(+) and Fcalc(-) is to run phenix.refine
with options (in case of S as anomalous scatterer)
refinement.input.xray_data.labels="F(+),SIGF(+),F(-),SIGF(-),merged" refinement.refine.anomalous_scatterers.group.selection="element S" strategy=individual_sites+individual_adp+group_anomalous+occupancies
and then
sftools <<eof read mymodel_001.mtz write anom-reference.hkl format(3i5,2f10.3) col "F-model(+)" "F-model(-)" y quit eof
in which case sftools
outputs only the acentric reflections - only those have anomalous differences. XDSCC12
then has to be run with the -s -r anom-reference.hkl
option. This allows a direct comparison of CC Iobs-Icalc, with Icalc either as (Fcalc(+) + Fcalc(-))/2 (these are the output lines starting with r) or with Iobs(+) being compared with Fcalc(+)2, and Iobs(-) being compared with Fcalc(-)2 (output lines starting with s). Preliminary insight: the r and s lines do not differ significantly.