Talk:Xscale: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(XSCALE 0-dose interpolation question) |
m (moved Talk:XSCALE to Talk:Xscale: make accessible under both spellings) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
This wiki page has a section about zero dose extrapolation, then a comment that interpolating to 0.25 dose or 0.75 is more accurate - it would be good to have an example of how to do this - for example, is it simply a matter of setting the starting dose to a negative value? | This wiki page has a section about zero dose extrapolation, then a comment that interpolating to 0.25 dose or 0.75 is more accurate - it would be good to have an example of how to do this - for example, is it simply a matter of setting the starting dose to a negative value? | ||
--[[User:Kay|Kay]] 19:09, 7 November 2008 (CET) yes, just set STARTING_DOSE= to a negative value, namely about 1/4 (22%) of the number of frames. Funny that I read your question today - my paper in J. Appl. Cryst. about this was accepted a few hours ago. |
Latest revision as of 11:57, 17 March 2011
Zero Dose Interpolation
This wiki page has a section about zero dose extrapolation, then a comment that interpolating to 0.25 dose or 0.75 is more accurate - it would be good to have an example of how to do this - for example, is it simply a matter of setting the starting dose to a negative value?
--Kay 19:09, 7 November 2008 (CET) yes, just set STARTING_DOSE= to a negative value, namely about 1/4 (22%) of the number of frames. Funny that I read your question today - my paper in J. Appl. Cryst. about this was accepted a few hours ago.