Wishlist: Difference between revisions

From XDSwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:




* Important:


none so far
== Important ==


* none so far


* Would be nice to have:


A breakdown of R<sub>meas</sub> by frame number, as currently only available from [[XDSSTAT]]. --[[User:Kay|Kay]] 14:00, 12 November 2007 (CET)


== Would be nice to have ==


* Cosmetical:
* A breakdown of R<sub>meas</sub> by frame number, as currently only available from [[XDSSTAT]]. --[[User:Kay|Kay]] 14:00, 12 November 2007 (CET)


CORRECT should print out MAXIMUM_NUMBER_OF_PROCESSORS= , and the actual number of processors used. --[[User:Kay|Kay]] 13:55, 12 November 2007 (CET)
* Templates of XDS.INP currently have
!EXCLUDE_RESOLUTION_RANGE= 3.93 3.87 !ice-ring at 3.897 Angstrom
!EXCLUDE_RESOLUTION_RANGE= 3.70 3.64 !ice-ring at 3.669 Angstrom
!EXCLUDE_RESOLUTION_RANGE= 3.47 3.41 !ice-ring at 3.441 Angstrom
!EXCLUDE_RESOLUTION_RANGE= 2.70 2.64 !ice-ring at 2.671 Angstrom
!EXCLUDE_RESOLUTION_RANGE= 2.28 2.22 !ice-ring at 2.249 Angstrom
This list should be completed by lines for the ice rings at 2.072, 1.948, 1.918, 1.883, 1.721 Angstrom. --[[User:Kay|Kay]] 14:30, 12 November 2007 (CET)
 
 
 
== Cosmetical ==
 
* CORRECT should print out MAXIMUM_NUMBER_OF_PROCESSORS= , and the actual number of processors used. --[[User:Kay|Kay]] 13:55, 12 November 2007 (CET)

Revision as of 14:30, 12 November 2007

This is a collection of things users feel XDS should handle differently from how the program currently does.

It would be useful if a user who edits this puts his "signature with timestamp" (second button from the right in the menu bar above) after the sentence s/he inserts.


Important

  • none so far


Would be nice to have

  • A breakdown of Rmeas by frame number, as currently only available from XDSSTAT. --Kay 14:00, 12 November 2007 (CET)
  • Templates of XDS.INP currently have
!EXCLUDE_RESOLUTION_RANGE= 3.93 3.87 !ice-ring at 3.897 Angstrom
!EXCLUDE_RESOLUTION_RANGE= 3.70 3.64 !ice-ring at 3.669 Angstrom
!EXCLUDE_RESOLUTION_RANGE= 3.47 3.41 !ice-ring at 3.441 Angstrom
!EXCLUDE_RESOLUTION_RANGE= 2.70 2.64 !ice-ring at 2.671 Angstrom
!EXCLUDE_RESOLUTION_RANGE= 2.28 2.22 !ice-ring at 2.249 Angstrom

This list should be completed by lines for the ice rings at 2.072, 1.948, 1.918, 1.883, 1.721 Angstrom. --Kay 14:30, 12 November 2007 (CET)


Cosmetical

  • CORRECT should print out MAXIMUM_NUMBER_OF_PROCESSORS= , and the actual number of processors used. --Kay 13:55, 12 November 2007 (CET)