Tips and Tricks: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== P1 data collection == | == P1 data collection == | ||
According to the classical paper ([http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S0907444999008367 Z. Dauter (1999), Acta Cryst D55, 1703]), the required rotation range for native data is 180°, and for anomalous data 180° + 2 theta_max (theta is the diffraction angle). <br /> However, experience shows that collection of a few degrees more than that is a good idea, as the scaling will be more stable. So we regularly collect 200° for native data. <br /> The Pilatus 6M detector at the SLS is composed of many panels, and therefore has horizontal and vertical dead areas | According to the classical paper ([http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S0907444999008367 Z. Dauter (1999), Acta Cryst D55, 1703]), the required rotation range for native data is 180°, and for anomalous data 180° + 2 theta_max (theta is the diffraction angle). In the case of the standard geometry (direct beam vertical to, and central upon, the detector), this leads to 2-fold redundancy. <br /> However, experience shows that collection of a few degrees more than that is a good idea, as the scaling will be more stable. So we regularly collect 200° for native data. <br /> The Pilatus 6M detector at the SLS is composed of many panels, and therefore has horizontal and vertical dead areas. This generally lowers completeness, and the effect is particularly noticeable in P1.<br />Untested: it may be a good idea to adjust the detector such that the direct beam is not at a crossing between horizontal and vertical dead areas, and not at the middle of a panel (because this avoids that both equivalent reflections suffer the same fate). | ||
Revision as of 12:35, 21 November 2007
P1 data collection
According to the classical paper (Z. Dauter (1999), Acta Cryst D55, 1703), the required rotation range for native data is 180°, and for anomalous data 180° + 2 theta_max (theta is the diffraction angle). In the case of the standard geometry (direct beam vertical to, and central upon, the detector), this leads to 2-fold redundancy.
However, experience shows that collection of a few degrees more than that is a good idea, as the scaling will be more stable. So we regularly collect 200° for native data.
The Pilatus 6M detector at the SLS is composed of many panels, and therefore has horizontal and vertical dead areas. This generally lowers completeness, and the effect is particularly noticeable in P1.
Untested: it may be a good idea to adjust the detector such that the direct beam is not at a crossing between horizontal and vertical dead areas, and not at the middle of a panel (because this avoids that both equivalent reflections suffer the same fate).