Known Bugs: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 09:11, 5 September 2008

The October 2007 and the November 2007 versions do not evaluate DATA_RANGE= in the CORRECT step. The August 2007, and versions since December 2007 do.
The June and July 2008 versions of "xds_par" under Linux suffer from a compiler bug in the CORRECT step: the correlation coefficient against a reference data set is always 0.00, and therefore sometimes the wrong decision is made concerning re-indexing of the data. The workaround is to use the single-processor version ("xds") instead.

Revision as of 14:35, 10 December 2007 (view source) Kay (talk \| contribs) mNo edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 09:11, 5 September 2008 (view source) Kay (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	* The October 2007 and the November 2007 versions do not evaluate DATA_RANGE= in the CORRECT step. The August 2007 and December 2007 versions do.		* The October 2007 and the November 2007 versions do not evaluate DATA_RANGE= in the CORRECT step. The August 2007, and versions since December 2007 do.
			* The June and July 2008 versions of "xds_par" under Linux suffer from a compiler bug in the CORRECT step: the correlation coefficient against a reference data set is always 0.00, and therefore sometimes the wrong decision is made concerning re-indexing of the data. The workaround is to use the single-processor version ("xds") instead.