MINIMUM ZETA: Difference between revisions

MINIMUM ZETA (view source)

38 bytes added , 9 November 2007

m

no edit summary

2,684

edits

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 == How could I check if a low value of MINIMUM_ZETA is beneficial for my data reduction? ==
-It does not hurt to use a low value of MINIMUM_ZETA (e.g. 0.05) in INTEGRATE, because in CORRECT you may still choose a higher value (i.e. you don't then have to re-run INTEGRATE if you want to test a different value).
+It does not hurt to use a low value of MINIMUM_ZETA (e.g. 0.05) in INTEGRATE, because in CORRECT you may still choose higher values (i.e. you don't then have to re-run INTEGRATE if you want to test a different value).
-Then, run CORRECT with higher values and see how this changes completeness and R-factors.
+Then, run CORRECT with the low values and with higher values and compare the resulting completeness and R-factors.
-For a finer evaluation, you might want to inspect the plot rf.pck of XDSSTAT .
+For a finer evaluation, you might want to inspect the plots called 'rf.pck' of [[XDSSTAT]] .
 == Examples ==