2,684
edits
1RQW: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 74: | Line 74: | ||
This is of course much more difficult, because the anomalous data are weaker (and as this is the second dataset collected from the crystal maybe there is already a little bit of radiation damage). | This is of course much more difficult, because the anomalous data are weaker (and as this is the second dataset collected from the crystal maybe there is already a little bit of radiation damage). | ||
A lot of care was put into the XDS data reduction - many of the ideas that can be found in this wiki were employed to get as good data as possible. | |||
The result is that the anomalous signal is useful - this is evident from the SHELXC statistics: | |||
Resl. Inf - 8.0 - 6.0 - 5.0 - 4.0 - 3.5 - 3.0 - 2.6 - 2.4 - 2.2 - 2.0 - 1.80 | Resl. Inf - 8.0 - 6.0 - 5.0 - 4.0 - 3.5 - 3.0 - 2.6 - 2.4 - 2.2 - 2.0 - 1.80 | ||
N(data) 346 427 519 1142 1123 1972 2830 2173 3043 4340 6339 | N(data) 346 427 519 1142 1123 1972 2830 2173 3043 4340 6339 | ||
| Line 91: | Line 93: | ||
[[Image:1rqw-inf-contrast-cycle.png]] [[Image:1rqw-inf-connectivity.png]] [[Image:1rqw-inf-ccmap-resolution.png]] | [[Image:1rqw-inf-contrast-cycle.png]] [[Image:1rqw-inf-connectivity.png]] [[Image:1rqw-inf-ccmap-resolution.png]] | ||
=== automatic structure solution using Auto-Rickshaw (http://www.embl-hamburg.de/Auto-Rickshaw/) === | |||
In the same way as with the peak data, Auto-Rickshaw was started. The structure could be solved but the process was laborious - take a look at the [[1rqw_arp_warp_log|Arp/Warp logfile]]! | |||
Once again, good job, Santosh! | |||