2,684
edits
Old wishes: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
(New page: The following "wishes" were implemented in the XDS version of June 2008. * CORRECT should print out the parameter of STRICT_ABSORPTION_CORRECTION= . The influence of this on the anomalous...) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* CORRECT should print out MINIMUM_I/SIGMA= . --[[User:Kay|Kay]] 14:24, 13 November 2007 (CET) | * CORRECT should print out MINIMUM_I/SIGMA= . --[[User:Kay|Kay]] 14:24, 13 November 2007 (CET) | ||
* document X-GEO_CORR and Y-GEO_CORR.--[[User:Kay|Kay]] 22:18, 12 December 2007 (CET) | * document X-GEO_CORR and Y-GEO_CORR.--[[User:Kay|Kay]] 22:18, 12 December 2007 (CET) | ||
* Templates of XDS.INP currently have | |||
!EXCLUDE_RESOLUTION_RANGE= 3.93 3.87 !ice-ring at 3.897 Angstrom | |||
!EXCLUDE_RESOLUTION_RANGE= 3.70 3.64 !ice-ring at 3.669 Angstrom | |||
!EXCLUDE_RESOLUTION_RANGE= 3.47 3.41 !ice-ring at 3.441 Angstrom | |||
!EXCLUDE_RESOLUTION_RANGE= 2.70 2.64 !ice-ring at 2.671 Angstrom | |||
!EXCLUDE_RESOLUTION_RANGE= 2.28 2.22 !ice-ring at 2.249 Angstrom | |||
This list may/could be completed by | |||
!EXCLUDE_RESOLUTION_RANGE= 2.102 2.042 !ice-ring at 2.072 Angstrom - should be strong | |||
!EXCLUDE_RESOLUTION_RANGE= 1.978 1.918 !ice-ring at 1.948 Angstrom - may be weak | |||
!EXCLUDE_RESOLUTION_RANGE= 1.948 1.888 !ice-ring at 1.918 Angstrom - should be strong | |||
!EXCLUDE_RESOLUTION_RANGE= 1.913 1.853 !ice-ring at 1.883 Angstrom - may be weak | |||
!EXCLUDE_RESOLUTION_RANGE= 1.751 1.691 !ice-ring at 1.721 Angstrom - may be weak | |||
Please note that I did not optimize the widths (in particular the last one should probably be something like 1.741 1.701 or 1.731 1.711), and that the ranges of the 2nd, 3rd and 4th ring overlap (and thus could be combined and narrowed to something like 1.958 1.873). | |||
--[[User:Kay|Kay]] 14:30, 12 November 2007 (CET) | |||