Xdscc12: Difference between revisions

491 bytes added ,  26 November 2018
No edit summary
Line 54: Line 54:
</pre>
</pre>


== Anomalous Fcalc as reference (under development) ==
== Fcalc with anomalous signal as reference ==
The easiest way is to run phenix.refine with options (in case of S as anomalous scatterer)
A simple way to obtain Fcalc(+) and Fcalc(-) is to run <code>phenix.refine</code> with options (in case of S as anomalous scatterer)
  refinement.input.xray_data.labels="F(+),SIGF(+),F(-),SIGF(-),merged"  
  refinement.input.xray_data.labels="F(+),SIGF(+),F(-),SIGF(-),merged"  
  refinement.refine.anomalous_scatterers.group.selection="element S"
  refinement.refine.anomalous_scatterers.group.selection="element S"
Line 61: Line 61:
and then
and then
<pre>
<pre>
sftools
sftools <<eof
read mymodel_001.mtz
read mymodel_001.mtz
write temp.hkl format(3i5,2f10.3) col "F-model(+)" "F-model(-)"
write anom-reference.hkl format(3i5,2f10.3) col "F-model(+)" "F-model(-)"
y
y
quit
quit
eof
</pre>
</pre>
sftools seems to output only the acentric reflections - but that should be ok since only those have anomalous differences.
in which case <code>sftools</code> outputs only the acentric reflections - only those have anomalous differences. <code>XDSCC12</code> then has to be run with the <code>-s -r anom-reference.hkl</code> option. This allows a direct comparison of CC Iobs-Icalc, with Icalc either as (Fcalc(+) + Fcalc(-))/2 (these are the output lines starting with r) or with Iobs(+) being compared with Fcalc(+)<sup>2</sup>, and Iobs(-) being compared with Fcalc(-)<sup>2</sup> (output lines starting with s). Preliminary insight: the r and s lines do not differ significantly.
2,684

edits