2,684
edits
SSX: Difference between revisions
m
link to xscale and xscale_isocluster
mNo edit summary |
m (link to xscale and xscale_isocluster) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
# the crystals decay to about 1/2 within these 3 frames | # the crystals decay to about 1/2 within these 3 frames | ||
# the b and c axes are the same length, but the simulated crystals are orthorhombic. This makes it difficult to index them consistently - it is wrong to just merge them in a orthorhombic space group without resolving the indexing ambiguity, because that yields a pseudo-tetragonal twinned merged data set. | # the b and c axes are the same length, but the simulated crystals are orthorhombic. This makes it difficult to index them consistently - it is wrong to just merge them in a orthorhombic space group without resolving the indexing ambiguity, because that yields a pseudo-tetragonal twinned merged data set. | ||
The solution is to use [[XSCALE]] for scaling, and [[xscale_isocluster]] for analysing the scaled data. | |||
== Round 1: processing the data, and determining the space group == | == Round 1: processing the data, and determining the space group == | ||