1Y13: Difference between revisions

1,020 bytes added ,  17 March 2011
No edit summary
Line 325: Line 325:


       NOTE:      Friedel pairs are treated as different reflections.
       NOTE:      Friedel pairs are treated as different reflections.
 
  SUBSET OF INTENSITY DATA WITH SIGNAL/NOISE >= -3.0 AS FUNCTION OF RESOLUTION
  SUBSET OF INTENSITY DATA WITH SIGNAL/NOISE >= -3.0 AS FUNCTION OF RESOLUTION
  RESOLUTION    NUMBER OF REFLECTIONS    COMPLETENESS R-FACTOR  R-FACTOR COMPARED I/SIGMA  R-meas  Rmrgd-F  Anomal  SigAno  Nano
  RESOLUTION    NUMBER OF REFLECTIONS    COMPLETENESS R-FACTOR  R-FACTOR COMPARED I/SIGMA  R-meas  Rmrgd-F  Anomal  SigAno  Nano
Line 353: Line 353:


The anomalous correlation is good at low resolution, though not outstanding. At high resolution it rises again but this is presumably due to the ice rings.
The anomalous correlation is good at low resolution, though not outstanding. At high resolution it rises again but this is presumably due to the ice rings.
I like to use [[ccp4com:hkl2map|hkl2map]] which runs [[ccp4com:SHELX C/D/E|SHELXC]], [[ccp4com:SHELX C/D/E|SHELXD]] and [[ccp4com:SHELX C/D/E|SHELXE]] from its GUI. Before doing so, we have to run XDSCONV with the following XDSCONV.INP:
INPUT_FILE=firstparts.hkl
OUTPUT_FILE=temp.hkl SHELX
First, the shelxc output which shows that these data are quite good:
[[File:e1+e2_firstparts-i-sigi-resol.png]] [[File:e1+e2_firstparts-self-anomcc.png]]
And then 100 trials of shelxd, trying to find 3 Se atoms at 30-3.3 resolution (I also tried 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.4 3.5 but 3.3 was best).
[[File:e1+e2_firstparts-ccall-ccweak.png]] [[File:e1+e2_firstparts-occ-vs-peak.png]]
This looks reasonable although the absolute value of CCall is so low that there is little hope that the structure can be solved with this amount of information. And indeed, SHELXE did not show a difference between the two hands (in fact we even know that the "original hand" is the correct one since the inverted had would correspond to spacegroup #92 !).
2,652

edits