2,652
edits
1Y13: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
a b ISa | a b ISa | ||
6.058E+00 3.027E-04 23.35 | 6.058E+00 3.027E-04 23.35 | ||
... | ... | ||
| Line 365: | Line 364: | ||
This looks reasonable although the absolute value of CCall is so low that there is little hope that the structure can be solved with this amount of information. And indeed, SHELXE did not show a difference between the two hands (in fact we even know that the "original hand" is the correct one since the inverted had would correspond to spacegroup #92 !). | This looks reasonable although the absolute value of CCall is so low that there is little hope that the structure can be solved with this amount of information. And indeed, SHELXE did not show a difference between the two hands (in fact we even know that the "original hand" is the correct one since the inverted had would correspond to spacegroup #92 !). | ||
=== Second try: correcting radiation damage | === Second try: correcting radiation damage by 0-dose extrapolation === | ||
Since we noted significant radiation damage we could try to correct that. All we have to do is ask XSCALE to do zero-dose extrapolation: | Since we noted significant radiation damage we could try to correct that. All we have to do is ask XSCALE to do zero-dose extrapolation: | ||