2,652
edits
1Y13: Difference between revisions
→Second try: correcting radiation damage by 0-dose extrapolation: typos
| Line 377: | Line 377: | ||
CRYSTAL_NAME=a | CRYSTAL_NAME=a | ||
</pre> | </pre> | ||
As a result we obtain: | As a result we obtain in XSCALE.LP: | ||
<pre> | <pre> | ||
| Line 579: | Line 579: | ||
</pre> | </pre> | ||
We | We note that the "CORRELATION OF COMMON DECAY-FACTORS BETWEEN INPUT DATA SETS" are really high which confirms the hypothesis that this is a valid procedure to perform. | ||
Comparison of the last table with that of the previous paragraph, i.e. without zero-dose extrapolation, shows that the I/sigma, the anomalous correlation coefficients and the SigAno are significantly higher. Does this translate into better structure solution? It does: | Comparison of the last table with that of the previous paragraph, i.e. without zero-dose extrapolation, shows that the I/sigma, the anomalous correlation coefficients and the SigAno are significantly higher. Does this translate into better structure solution? It does: | ||