2QVO.xds: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
This is an example of S-SAD structure solution (PDB id [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore.do?structureId=2QVO AF1382]), a 95-residue protein used by James Tucker Swindell II to establish optimized procedures for data reduction. The data available to solve the structure are two runs of 360° collected at 1.9Å wavelength.
This is an example of S-SAD structure solution (PDB id [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore.do?structureId=2QVO 2QVO]), a 95-residue protein used by James Tucker Swindell II to establish optimized procedures for data reduction. The data available to solve the structure are two runs of 360° collected at a wavelength of 1.9Å.


==XDS data reduction==
==XDS data reduction==


In the course of writing this up, it turned out that it was not necessary to scale the two datasets together, using [[XSCALE]], because the structure can be solved from any of the two, separately.
In the course of writing this up, it turned out that it was not necessary to scale the two datasets together, using [[XSCALE]], because the structure can be solved from any of the two, separately. But, of course, structure solution would be easier when merging the data (try for yourself!).


===dataset 1===
===dataset 1===
Line 140: Line 140:
  NUMBER OF UNIQUE ACCEPTED REFLECTIONS                13784
  NUMBER OF UNIQUE ACCEPTED REFLECTIONS                13784


So the anomalous signal goes to about 3.3 A (which is where 30% would be, in the "Anomal Corr" column), and the useful resolution goes to 2.16 A, I'd say (pls note that this table treats Friedels separately; merging them increases I/sigma by another factor of 1.41).
So the anomalous signal goes to about 3.3 Å (which is where 30% would be, in the "Anomal Corr" column), and the useful resolution goes to 2.16 Å, I'd say (pls note that this table treats Friedels separately; merging them increases I/sigma by another factor of 1.41).


For the sake of comparability, from now on we use the same axes (53.03 53.03 40.97) as the deposited PDB id 2QVO.
For the sake of comparability, from now on we use the same axes (53.03 53.03 40.97) as the deposited PDB id 2QVO.
Line 266: Line 266:
  shelxd j_fa
  shelxd j_fa


This gives best CC All/Weak of 37.28 / 21.38 for dataset 1, and best CC All/Weak of 37.89 / 23.80 for dataset 2, and .  
This gives best CC All/Weak of 37.28 / 21.38 for dataset 1, and best CC All/Weak of 37.89 / 23.80 for dataset 2.  


Next we run G. Sheldrick's beta-Version of [[ccp4com:SHELX_C/D/E|SHELXE]] Version 2011/1:
Next we run G. Sheldrick's beta-Version of [[ccp4com:SHELX_C/D/E|SHELXE]] Version 2011/1:
2,652

edits