2VB1: Difference between revisions

123 bytes added ,  20 February 2011
Line 31: Line 31:
  JOBS=DEFPIX INTEGRATE CORRECT
  JOBS=DEFPIX INTEGRATE CORRECT
and run "xds_par" again. It completes after about 5 minutes on a fast machine, and we may inspect CORRECT.LP .
and run "xds_par" again. It completes after about 5 minutes on a fast machine, and we may inspect CORRECT.LP .


== timings for processing sweep "e" as a function of MAXIMUM_NUMBER_OF_PROCESSORS and MAXIMUM_NUMBER_OF_JOBS ==
== timings for processing sweep "e" as a function of MAXIMUM_NUMBER_OF_PROCESSORS and MAXIMUM_NUMBER_OF_JOBS ==
Line 63: Line 64:
  total cpu time used              2833.4 sec
  total cpu time used              2833.4 sec
  total elapsed wall-clock time      566.5 sec
  total elapsed wall-clock time      566.5 sec
but please note that this actually only uses 10 processors, since the default DELPHI=5
and the OSCILLATION_RANGE is 0.5°.


Using
Using
Line 82: Line 85:
  MAXIMUM_NUMBER_OF_JOBS=6
  MAXIMUM_NUMBER_OF_JOBS=6
performs best for a 2-Xeon X5570 machine with 24GB of memory and a RAID1 consisting of 2 1TB SATA disks. It should be noted that the dataset has 27GB, and in 296 seconds this means 92 MB/s continuous reading. The processing time is thus limited by the disk access, not by the CPU. And no, the data are not simply read from RAM (tested by "echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches before the XDS run).
performs best for a 2-Xeon X5570 machine with 24GB of memory and a RAID1 consisting of 2 1TB SATA disks. It should be noted that the dataset has 27GB, and in 296 seconds this means 92 MB/s continuous reading. The processing time is thus limited by the disk access, not by the CPU. And no, the data are not simply read from RAM (tested by "echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches before the XDS run).


== Comparison of XDS and published results of data processing ==
== Comparison of XDS and published results of data processing ==
2,652

edits