2,652
edits
2VB1: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== XDS processing == | == XDS processing == | ||
* use [[generate_XDS.INP]] to obtain a good starting point | * use [[generate_XDS.INP]] to obtain a good starting point | ||
| Line 85: | Line 84: | ||
MAXIMUM_NUMBER_OF_JOBS=6 | MAXIMUM_NUMBER_OF_JOBS=6 | ||
performs best for a 2-Xeon X5570 machine with 24GB of memory and a RAID1 consisting of 2 1TB SATA disks. It should be noted that the dataset has 27GB, and in 296 seconds this means 92 MB/s continuous reading. The processing time is thus limited by the disk access, not by the CPU. And no, the data are not simply read from RAM (tested by "echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches before the XDS run). | performs best for a 2-Xeon X5570 machine with 24GB of memory and a RAID1 consisting of 2 1TB SATA disks. It should be noted that the dataset has 27GB, and in 296 seconds this means 92 MB/s continuous reading. The processing time is thus limited by the disk access, not by the CPU. And no, the data are not simply read from RAM (tested by "echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches before the XDS run). | ||
== Example: sweep e == | |||
=== XDS.INP === | |||
=== CORRECT.LP main table; 1st pass === | |||
=== CORRECT.LP main table; optimization pass === | |||
== XSCALE results == | |||
a few sweeps were optimized by copying the two lines containing mosaicity and beam divergence values from | |||
=== main table === | |||
SUBSET OF INTENSITY DATA WITH SIGNAL/NOISE >= -3.0 AS FUNCTION OF RESOLUTION | SUBSET OF INTENSITY DATA WITH SIGNAL/NOISE >= -3.0 AS FUNCTION OF RESOLUTION | ||