3CSL: Difference between revisions

3,618 bytes added ,  18 March 2011
Line 32: Line 32:


360 frames (0.5° oscillation) at the peak wavelength were collected after the high-remote data. They can be downloaded from [ftp://turn5.biologie.uni-konstanz.de/pub/datasets/3csl-pk.tar here] (1.9 Gb). This peak dataset is somewhat difficult to index; if the results are really bad (e.g. distance refining far away from 370 mm) with the default 180 frames, then just try with 90 or 270 frames.
360 frames (0.5° oscillation) at the peak wavelength were collected after the high-remote data. They can be downloaded from [ftp://turn5.biologie.uni-konstanz.de/pub/datasets/3csl-pk.tar here] (1.9 Gb). This peak dataset is somewhat difficult to index; if the results are really bad (e.g. distance refining far away from 370 mm) with the default 180 frames, then just try with 90 or 270 frames.
This is an excerpt from [[CORRECT.LP]] :
REFINED PARAMETERS:  DISTANCE BEAM ORIENTATION CELL AXIS                 
USING  166758 INDEXED SPOTS
STANDARD DEVIATION OF SPOT    POSITION (PIXELS)    1.80
STANDARD DEVIATION OF SPINDLE POSITION (DEGREES)    0.61
CRYSTAL MOSAICITY (DEGREES)    0.557
DIRECT BEAM COORDINATES (REC. ANGSTROEM)  0.001590 -0.003616  1.021443
DETECTOR COORDINATES (PIXELS) OF DIRECT BEAM    1536.60  1519.03
DETECTOR ORIGIN (PIXELS) AT                    1528.72  1536.95
CRYSTAL TO DETECTOR DISTANCE (mm)      370.85
LAB COORDINATES OF DETECTOR X-AXIS  1.000000  0.000000  0.000000
LAB COORDINATES OF DETECTOR Y-AXIS  0.000000  1.000000  0.000000
LAB COORDINATES OF ROTATION AXIS  0.999995 -0.001537 -0.002692
COORDINATES OF UNIT CELL A-AXIS  -41.622  -128.332    80.636
COORDINATES OF UNIT CELL B-AXIS    45.889    72.744  139.459
COORDINATES OF UNIT CELL C-AXIS  -551.193  220.474    66.370
REC. CELL PARAMETERS  0.006362  0.006103  0.001674  90.000  90.000  90.000
UNIT CELL PARAMETERS    157.174  163.848  597.351  90.000  90.000  90.000
E.S.D. OF CELL PARAMETERS  7.9E-01 8.7E-01 3.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00
SPACE GROUP NUMBER    22
...
    a        b          ISa
7.764E+00  7.144E-04  13.43
...
      NOTE:      Friedel pairs are treated as different reflections.
SUBSET OF INTENSITY DATA WITH SIGNAL/NOISE >= -3.0 AS FUNCTION OF RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION    NUMBER OF REFLECTIONS    COMPLETENESS R-FACTOR  R-FACTOR COMPARED I/SIGMA  R-meas  Rmrgd-F  Anomal  SigAno  Nano
  LIMIT    OBSERVED  UNIQUE  POSSIBLE    OF DATA  observed  expected                                      Corr
    8.29      26331    7014      7090      98.9%      5.3%      5.5%    26314  20.22    6.3%    4.2%    71%  1.936    3195
    5.90      48060  12542    12555      99.9%      8.4%      8.4%    48060  13.36    9.8%    8.5%    45%  1.322    5963
    4.83      61534  16074    16144      99.6%      11.0%    10.6%    61534  10.69    12.9%    13.2%    27%  1.051    7728
    4.19      71665  18994    19085      99.5%      12.5%    11.8%    71658    9.61    14.6%    16.0%    18%  0.920    9190
    3.75      77668  21598    21677      99.6%      19.5%    19.3%    77668    6.33    23.0%    27.1%    6%  0.794  10491
    3.42      78594  23767    23865      99.6%      28.3%    29.5%    78582    4.14    34.0%    45.0%    4%  0.735  11548
    3.17      64135  24351    26036      93.5%      42.7%    46.4%    60830    2.18    52.9%    78.5%    2%  0.689    9568
    2.97      40861  20207    27920      72.4%      63.8%    72.3%    35172    1.18    83.3%  118.6%    1%  0.657    6055
    2.80      23238  15074    29715      50.7%      89.5%    104.9%    15359    0.63  122.8%  175.5%    5%  0.646    2502
    total      492086  159621    184087      86.7%      14.8%    15.1%  475177    6.17    17.8%    30.6%    22%  0.901  66240
NUMBER OF REFLECTIONS IN SELECTED SUBSET OF IMAGES  501334
NUMBER OF REJECTED MISFITS                            8429
NUMBER OF SYSTEMATIC ABSENT REFLECTIONS                  0
NUMBER OF ACCEPTED OBSERVATIONS                    492905
NUMBER OF UNIQUE ACCEPTED REFLECTIONS              159845
The verdict is clear: bad ISa, anomalous correlation > 30% only to about 5 A. The reason becomes clear if we load FRAME.cbf into [[XDS-Viewer]], and zoom in:
[[File:3csl-frame.png]]
It is clear that these split reflections provide bad data. Fortunately it seems that in other areas of the detector, the reflections look better.


=== Inflection ===
=== Inflection ===


360 frames (0.5° oscillation) at the inflection wavelength were collected after the peak data. They can be downloaded from [ftp://turn5.biologie.uni-konstanz.de/pub/datasets/3csl-ip.tar here] (1.8 Gb).
360 frames (0.5° oscillation) at the inflection wavelength were collected after the peak data. They can be downloaded from [ftp://turn5.biologie.uni-konstanz.de/pub/datasets/3csl-ip.tar here] (1.8 Gb).
2,652

edits