3CSL: Difference between revisions

3,056 bytes added ,  18 March 2011
no edit summary
No edit summary
Line 118: Line 118:
The verdict is clear: bad ISa, anomalous correlation > 30% only to about 5 A. The reason becomes clear if we load FRAME.cbf into [[XDS-Viewer]], and zoom in:
The verdict is clear: bad ISa, anomalous correlation > 30% only to about 5 A. The reason becomes clear if we load FRAME.cbf into [[XDS-Viewer]], and zoom in:
[[File:3csl-frame.png]]
[[File:3csl-frame.png]]
It is clear that these split reflections provide bad data. Fortunately it seems that in other areas of the detector, the reflections look better.
It is clear that these split reflections provide bad data. Fortunately it seems that in other areas of the detector, the reflections look better.
We can use the "scalefactors" [[jiffies|jiffy]] to investigate the scale factor, and the estimates for mosaicity and beam divergence of each frame:
[[File:3csl-pk-scalefactors.png]]
[[File:3csl-pk-mosaicity.png]]
[[File:3csl-pk-beamdiv.png]]
Next, we can use xdsstat to get frame-wise statistics from XDS_ASCII.HKL:
[[File:3csl-pk-xdsstat1.png]]
This shows a "jump" around frame 225 which is always bad for experimental phasing!
[[File:3csl-pk-xdsstat2.png]]
Around frame 225 the data are weakest, but they recover.
[[File:3csl-pk-xdsstat3.png]]
In particular the correlation against standard profiles (blue curve) is ''really'' low.
[[File:3csl-pk-xdsstat4.png]]
R-factors peak around frame 225.
[[File:3csl-pk-rd.png]]
R_d helps to quantify radiation damage. Unfortunately, for this dataset this "R-factor as a function of frame number difference" behaves wildly, so we cannot use 0-dose extrapolation, like we successfully did for [[1Y13]].


=== Inflection ===
=== Inflection ===


360 frames (0.5° oscillation) at the inflection wavelength were collected after the peak data. They can be downloaded from [ftp://turn5.biologie.uni-konstanz.de/pub/datasets/3csl-ip.tar here] (1.8 Gb).
360 frames (0.5° oscillation) at the inflection wavelength were collected after the peak data. They can be downloaded from [ftp://turn5.biologie.uni-konstanz.de/pub/datasets/3csl-ip.tar here] (1.8 Gb).
CORRECT.LP has:
    a        b          ISa
6.514E+00  5.329E-04  16.97
...
      NOTE:      Friedel pairs are treated as different reflections.
SUBSET OF INTENSITY DATA WITH SIGNAL/NOISE >= -3.0 AS FUNCTION OF RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION    NUMBER OF REFLECTIONS    COMPLETENESS R-FACTOR  R-FACTOR COMPARED I/SIGMA  R-meas  Rmrgd-F  Anomal  SigAno  Nano
  LIMIT    OBSERVED  UNIQUE  POSSIBLE    OF DATA  observed  expected                                      Corr
    8.28      26530    7039      7111      99.0%      4.4%      4.6%    26516  23.79    5.2%    3.7%    57%  1.526    3211
    5.90      48700  12589    12598      99.9%      8.7%      8.5%    48700  14.00    10.2%    9.2%    23%  1.052    5989
    4.83      62546  16177    16208      99.8%      12.0%    11.5%    62546  10.85    13.9%    14.5%    12%  0.912    7784
    4.18      72644  19076    19117      99.8%      13.6%    13.1%    72637    9.64    15.9%    17.3%    8%  0.850    9229
    3.75      80829  21710    21740      99.9%      23.8%    24.0%    80829    5.92    27.9%    32.0%    1%  0.770  10553
    3.42      86652  23874    23917      99.8%      38.5%    39.9%    86652    3.71    45.2%    53.8%    3%  0.737  11620
    3.17      73630  25264    26115      96.7%      64.4%    68.0%    71837    1.82    78.5%  109.4%    3%  0.693  10945
    2.96      48079  22582    28004      80.6%      99.2%    107.3%    43325    0.86  129.6%  186.7%    3%  0.654    7797
    2.80      28417  17801    29828      59.7%    155.6%    168.5%    20099    0.43  214.2%  307.3%    3%  0.613    3713
    total      528027  166112    184638      90.0%      17.6%    17.8%  513141    5.98    20.9%    38.7%    10%  0.816  70841
NUMBER OF REFLECTIONS IN SELECTED SUBSET OF IMAGES  534898
NUMBER OF REJECTED MISFITS                            6486
NUMBER OF SYSTEMATIC ABSENT REFLECTIONS                  0
NUMBER OF ACCEPTED OBSERVATIONS                    528412
NUMBER OF UNIQUE ACCEPTED REFLECTIONS              166224
2,652

edits