Known Bugs: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
* The October 2007 and the November 2007 versions do not evaluate DATA_RANGE= in the CORRECT step. The August 2007, and versions since December 2007 do. | * The October 2007 and the November 2007 versions do not evaluate DATA_RANGE= in the CORRECT step. The August 2007 version, and versions since December 2007 do. | ||
* The June and July 2008 versions of "xds_par" under Linux suffer from a compiler bug in the CORRECT step: the correlation coefficient against a reference data set is always 0.00, and therefore sometimes the wrong decision is made concerning re-indexing of the data. The workaround is to use the single-processor version ("xds") instead. | * The June and July 2008 versions of "xds_par" under Linux suffer from a compiler bug in the CORRECT step: the correlation coefficient against a reference data set is always 0.00, and therefore sometimes the wrong decision is made concerning re-indexing of the data. Example taken from CORRECT.LP produced with xds_par: | ||
CORRELATION NPAIR Rmeas COMPARED ESD REINDEX TRANSFORMATION | |||
0.00211818312 25.1 53803 1.65 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 | |||
* 0.00260052808 25.1 53803 1.65 1 1 0 0 -1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 | |||
whereas xds produces the correct output: | |||
CORRELATION NPAIR Rmeas COMPARED ESD REINDEX TRANSFORMATION | |||
* 0.89 5960 25.1 53803 1.65 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 | |||
0.06 5960 25.1 53803 1.65 1 1 0 0 -1 0 0 0 0 0 1 | |||
The workaround is to use the single-processor version ("xds") instead. | |||
Revision as of 10:14, 5 September 2008
- The October 2007 and the November 2007 versions do not evaluate DATA_RANGE= in the CORRECT step. The August 2007 version, and versions since December 2007 do.
- The June and July 2008 versions of "xds_par" under Linux suffer from a compiler bug in the CORRECT step: the correlation coefficient against a reference data set is always 0.00, and therefore sometimes the wrong decision is made concerning re-indexing of the data. Example taken from CORRECT.LP produced with xds_par:
CORRELATION NPAIR Rmeas COMPARED ESD REINDEX TRANSFORMATION
0.00211818312 25.1 53803 1.65 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0
* 0.00260052808 25.1 53803 1.65 1 1 0 0 -1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
whereas xds produces the correct output:
CORRELATION NPAIR Rmeas COMPARED ESD REINDEX TRANSFORMATION
* 0.89 5960 25.1 53803 1.65 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0
0.06 5960 25.1 53803 1.65 1 1 0 0 -1 0 0 0 0 0 1
The workaround is to use the single-processor version ("xds") instead.