Known Bugs: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
1,036 bytes removed ,  1 February 2017
Blanked the page
mNo edit summary
(Blanked the page)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
* The October 2007 and the November 2007 versions do not evaluate DATA_RANGE= in the CORRECT step. The August 2007 version, and versions since December 2007 do.
 
* The June and July 2008 versions of "xds_par" under Linux suffer from a bug in the CORRECT step: the correlation coefficient against a reference data set is always 0.00, and therefore sometimes the wrong decision is made concerning re-indexing of the data. Example taken from CORRECT.LP produced with xds_par:
CORRELATION  NPAIR  Rmeas  COMPARED  ESD      REINDEX TRANSFORMATION
      0.00211818312  25.1  53803    1.65  1  0  0  0  0  1  0  0  0  0  1  0
  *  0.00260052808  25.1  53803    1.65  1  1  0  0 -1  0  0  0  0  0  1  0
whereas xds produces the correct output:
CORRELATION  NPAIR  Rmeas  COMPARED  ESD      REINDEX TRANSFORMATION
  *  0.89    5960  25.1  53803    1.65  1  0  0  0  0  1  0  0  0  0  1  0
      0.06    5960  25.1  53803    1.65  1  1  0  0 -1  0  0  0  0  0  1  0
The problem is fixed in XDS versions starting September 2008.
2,652

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.

Navigation menu