MINIMUM ZETA: Difference between revisions

MINIMUM ZETA (view source)

15 bytes added , 16 November 2007

m

no edit summary

2,652

edits

Revision as of 17:35, 9 November 2007 (view source) Kay (talk \| contribs) m (→‎An example) ← Older edit		Revision as of 00:21, 16 November 2007 (view source) Kay (talk \| contribs) mNo edit summary Newer edit →
Line 80:		Line 80:
	[[Image:ms688-frame.png]]		[[Image:ms688-frame.png]]

	~~Form~~ looking at rf.pck of many datasets, it is my experience that at the SLS (X06SA), the R-factors along the spindle are better than perpendicular to it, which is quite surprising (and should be investigated). However it is clear that for these data, it is a good thing to decrease MINIMUM_ZETA because ~~good~~ reflections are added to the data set.		From looking at rf.pck of many datasets, it is my experience that at the SLS (X06SA), the R-factors along the spindle are better than perpendicular to it, which is quite surprising (and should be investigated). However it is clear that for these data, it is a good thing to decrease MINIMUM_ZETA because accurately measured reflections are added to the data set.