2,652
edits
XDS.INP: Difference between revisions
m
→Keywords which affect which detector pixels will be used
| Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
[http://www.mpimf-heidelberg.mpg.de/~kabsch/xds/html_doc/xds_parameters.html#TRUSTED_REGION= TRUSTED_REGION] - The default is "0.00 1.05" but if you have a square detector, and their are reflections visible in the corners, you may go as high as "0. 1.4142". Depending on the symmetry of your crystal, this may give you useful high-resolution data. | [http://www.mpimf-heidelberg.mpg.de/~kabsch/xds/html_doc/xds_parameters.html#TRUSTED_REGION= TRUSTED_REGION] - The default is "0.00 1.05" but if you have a square detector, and their are reflections visible in the corners, you may go as high as "0. 1.4142". Depending on the symmetry of your crystal, this may give you useful high-resolution data. | ||
[http://www.mpimf-heidelberg.mpg.de/~kabsch/xds/html_doc/xds_parameters.html#EXCLUDE_RESOLUTION_RANGE= EXCLUDE_RESOLUTION_RANGE] - to exclude ice rings. Whether ice rings are a problem should be obvious by looking at frames, FRAME.pck and the "alien" statistics at the end of [[CORRECT.LP]]. Please note that there are five more | [http://www.mpimf-heidelberg.mpg.de/~kabsch/xds/html_doc/xds_parameters.html#EXCLUDE_RESOLUTION_RANGE= EXCLUDE_RESOLUTION_RANGE] - to exclude ice rings. Whether ice rings are a problem should be obvious by looking at frames, FRAME.pck and the "alien" statistics at the end of [[CORRECT.LP]]. Please note that there are five more "high-resolution" ice ring resolution ranges (given at the end of [[CORRECT.LP]]), in addition to the five ranges already supplied in templates of XDS.INP. | ||
== Keywords which affect aspects of parameter refinement == | == Keywords which affect aspects of parameter refinement == | ||