Refinement: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No change in size ,  5 November 2008
Line 38: Line 38:
There are some options, but in the end you might have to accept a fairly large number of [[Ramachandran plot]] outliers.
There are some options, but in the end you might have to accept a fairly large number of [[Ramachandran plot]] outliers.


Try [[PHENIX|phenix.refine]] with the keyword "discard_psi_phi=False". Then the psi and phi dihedral angles should be restrained according to the CCP4 monomer library definitions. There was a [http://www.phenix-online.org/pipermail/phenixbb/2007-July/000357.html discussion of in in the phenixbb in July 2007]. Also see the [http://www.dl.ac.uk/list-archive-public/ccp4bb/msg19554.html discussion in the ccp4bb from December 2006].
Try [[PHENIX|phenix.refine]] with the keyword "discard_psi_phi=False". Then the psi and phi dihedral angles should be restrained according to the CCP4 monomer library definitions. There was a [http://www.phenix-online.org/pipermail/phenixbb/2007-July/000357.html discussion of it in the phenixbb in July 2007]. Also see the [http://www.dl.ac.uk/list-archive-public/ccp4bb/msg19554.html discussion in the ccp4bb from December 2006].


Remember that [[Ramachandran plot|phi-psi angles]] are excellent for [[validation]] purposes but only when they are unrestrained. If you restrain them, you lose this option!
Remember that [[Ramachandran plot|phi-psi angles]] are excellent for [[validation]] purposes but only when they are unrestrained. If you restrain them, you lose this option!
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.

Navigation menu