Properties of proteins: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
== Ideal metal bond distances ==
== Ideal metal bond distances ==
* classic paper: Harding, M. (1999) [http://journals.iucr.org/d/issues/1999/08/00/ad0073/index.html The geometry of metal-ligand interactions relevant to proteins]
* classic paper: Harding, M. (1999) [http://journals.iucr.org/d/issues/1999/08/00/ad0073/index.html The geometry of metal-ligand interactions relevant to proteins]
* webservice (2006) http://tanna.bch.ed.ac.uk/index.html  
* webservice (2006) http://tanna.bch.ed.ac.uk/index.html  
* database (2008) http://eduliss.bch.ed.ac.uk/MESPEUS/
* database (2008) http://eduliss.bch.ed.ac.uk/MESPEUS/
== Distinguishing ions from waters ==
A paper exists about the bond valence method (Acta Cryst.
2003 D59 32-37). Subsequent experience has shown that although
this method works well for identifying ions such as Mg2+ and Ca2+ with
good resolution data, it is not reliable in other cases such as Na+.
Whereas Cl- can often be seen in anom maps, Na+ has a lower f".
There are however some tentative indicators for Na+. The bond valence
sum (the sum of the 'bond orders' to the surrounding atoms estimated
from the distances) tends to be higher than for Cl- or H2O.
Tetrahedral coordination is more likely to be water or Cl-, Na+
prefers 5 or 6 neighbors. And of course two cations (or two anions)
that are close to each other should not have an occupancy sum greater
than unity.
1,330

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.

Navigation menu