Test set: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
53 bytes added ,  2 June 2015
no edit summary
(cosmetics and wiki links)
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:


==How precise is the estimate of R<sub>free</sub> for a certain number of test set reflections?==
==How precise is the estimate of R<sub>free</sub> for a certain number of test set reflections?==
The estimate for the relative error of [[iucr:Free_R_factor|R<sub>free</sub>]] is 1/sqrt(n), where n is the size of the test set. So if n is 1000, and the [[iucr:Free_R_factor|R<sub>free</sub>]] is 31%, you would expect its relative error to be 31%/sqrt(1000), which is about 1%.
The estimate for the relative error of [[iucr:Free_R_factor|R<sub>free</sub>]] is 1/sqrt(2n), where n is the size of the test set (Tickle et al., Acta Cryst. (2000) D56 , 442-450). So if n is 1000, and the [[iucr:Free_R_factor|R<sub>free</sub>]] is 31%, you would expect its relative error to be 31%/sqrt(2000), which is about 0.7%.


I believe this is from a paper of Ian Tickle (FIXME: reference).
I believe this is from a paper of Ian Tickle (FIXME: reference).
25

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.

Navigation menu