1,330
edits
CC1/2: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Examples for citations from papers using (possibly among other criteria) CC<sub>1/2</sub> and/or the paired refinement method (reference below) for finding the high-resolution cutoff. | Examples for citations from papers using (possibly among other criteria) CC<sub>1/2</sub> and/or the paired refinement method (reference below) for finding the high-resolution cutoff. | ||
# "In choosing our highest-resolution cutoff we chose shells, which still fulfil CC1/2 (ref. 57) >25% and I/σ(I)greater than or equal to 0.5 and which were supported by our results from the paired refinement method (ref. 57). Choosing a lower resolution cutoff did not improve the overall quality of the maps." Models were refined at 6.0 and 3.4 Å, respectively [http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2016/160419/ncomms11184/full/ncomms11184.html]. | # "In choosing our highest-resolution cutoff we chose shells, which still fulfil CC1/2 (ref. 57) >25% and I/σ(I) greater than or equal to 0.5 and which were supported by our results from the paired refinement method (ref. 57). Choosing a lower resolution cutoff did not improve the overall quality of the maps." Models were refined at 6.0 and 3.4 Å, respectively [http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2016/160419/ncomms11184/full/ncomms11184.html]. | ||
# http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nature18934.html#methods "The final data set used for structure solution and refinement was merged from data from nine crystals for apo-SMOΔC and two crystals for vismo-SMOΔC. Data collection statistics are shown in Extended Data Table 1." That table shows high resolution values of 3.2 and 3.3 Å, respectively, with CC<sub>1/2</sub> of 0.237 and 0.357, and I/σ(I) of 0.6. It also gives CC*, CC<sub>work</sub> and CC<sub>free</sub> and demonstrates that CC<sub>work</sub> < CC*, as is to be expected. | |||