SHELXL: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
239 bytes added ,  13 March 2008
m
Line 4: Line 4:
* go to http://shelx.uni-ac.gwdg.de/SHELX and read "SHELX-97 Manual as PDF", "Mini-protein refinement tutorial" as well as "P1-Lysozyme refinement tutorial", "Thomas Schneider's FAQs" and "FAQs: Macromolecules"
* go to http://shelx.uni-ac.gwdg.de/SHELX and read "SHELX-97 Manual as PDF", "Mini-protein refinement tutorial" as well as "P1-Lysozyme refinement tutorial", "Thomas Schneider's FAQs" and "FAQs: Macromolecules"
* run shelxpro to obtain .ins file from .pdb file; a ligand may require the "J" option
* run shelxpro to obtain .ins file from .pdb file; a ligand may require the "J" option
* use "CGLS x y" refinement until convergence; the final run should be "CGLS x" only.
* use "CGLS x y" refinement until convergence; the last run should be "CGLS x" only.
* a final job to get standard uncertainties (s.u., formerly e.s.d.) on all geometric parameters (see Q21 in "FAQs: Macromolecules"):
* a final job to get standard uncertainties (s.u., formerly e.s.d.) on all geometric parameters (see Q21 in "FAQs: Macromolecules"):
** change CGLS x y to REM CGLS x y
** change CGLS x y to REM CGLS x y
** insert lines L.S. 1, DAMP 0 0 and BLOC 1 (or e.g. BLOC N_1 > LAST )
** insert lines L.S. 1, DAMP 0 0 and BLOC 1 (or e.g. BLOC N_1 > LAST )
** remove all restraints: lines begining with SIMU, DELU, ISOR, BUMP, DFIX, DANG, CHIV, FLAT (from "Mini-protein refinement tutorial"). (Editor's) Note a): NCSY then should also be removed, right? b) all of this is only useful for high-resolution work (let's say 1.4 A). At low to medium resolution my question would rather be: what are the s.u. on distances between these atoms, given that these atoms are covalently bound to other atoms, and are thus restrained?  
** remove all restraints: lines begining with SIMU, DELU, ISOR, BUMP, DFIX, DANG, CHIV, FLAT (from "Mini-protein refinement tutorial"). (Editor's) Note a): NCSY then should also be removed, right? b) all of this is only useful for high-resolution work (let's say 1.4 A). At low to medium resolution my typical question would rather be: what are the s.u. on distances between atoms x and y, given that these atoms are covalently bound to other atoms, and are thus restrained? In other words, I would keep all geometric restraints and ask "how much is the s.u. on this distance based on crystallographic data (reflections to some resolution) for this model (with its R-factor, B-factors and restraints)?".
** BOND, RTAB, HTAB and MPLA instructions may be needed to define the dependent parameters for which esds are required (from "FAQs: Macromolecules"). As an example, BIND FE_5001 NE2_123 together with BOND FE_5001 NE2_123 would enter the distance between FE_5001 and NE2_123 into the connectivity table, and would print out the distance and its s.u. in the .lst file.
** BOND, RTAB, HTAB and MPLA instructions may be needed to define the dependent parameters for which esds are required (from "FAQs: Macromolecules"). As an example, BIND FE_5001 NE2_123 together with BOND FE_5001 NE2_123 would enter the distance between FE_5001 and NE2_123 into the connectivity table, and would print out the distance and its s.u. into the .lst file.
1,330

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.

Navigation menu