Test set: Difference between revisions

65 bytes removed ,  2 June 2015
Reference to Ian Tickle et al. for sigma(Rfree)/Rfree = 1/sqrt(2n)
No edit summary
(Reference to Ian Tickle et al. for sigma(Rfree)/Rfree = 1/sqrt(2n))
 
Line 12: Line 12:
The estimate for the relative error of [[iucr:Free_R_factor|R<sub>free</sub>]] is 1/sqrt(2n), where n is the size of the test set (Tickle et al., Acta Cryst. (2000) D56 , 442-450). So if n is 1000, and the [[iucr:Free_R_factor|R<sub>free</sub>]] is 31%, you would expect its relative error to be 31%/sqrt(2000), which is about 0.7%.
The estimate for the relative error of [[iucr:Free_R_factor|R<sub>free</sub>]] is 1/sqrt(2n), where n is the size of the test set (Tickle et al., Acta Cryst. (2000) D56 , 442-450). So if n is 1000, and the [[iucr:Free_R_factor|R<sub>free</sub>]] is 31%, you would expect its relative error to be 31%/sqrt(2000), which is about 0.7%.


I believe this is from a paper of Ian Tickle (FIXME: reference).


==How many reflections do you need to get a good estimate of the sigmaA values (as a function of resolution) needed to calibrate the likelihood target?==
==How many reflections do you need to get a good estimate of the sigmaA values (as a function of resolution) needed to calibrate the likelihood target?==
25

edits