SHELXL: Difference between revisions

239 bytes added ,  13 March 2008
m
Line 4: Line 4:
* go to http://shelx.uni-ac.gwdg.de/SHELX and read "SHELX-97 Manual as PDF", "Mini-protein refinement tutorial" as well as "P1-Lysozyme refinement tutorial", "Thomas Schneider's FAQs" and "FAQs: Macromolecules"
* go to http://shelx.uni-ac.gwdg.de/SHELX and read "SHELX-97 Manual as PDF", "Mini-protein refinement tutorial" as well as "P1-Lysozyme refinement tutorial", "Thomas Schneider's FAQs" and "FAQs: Macromolecules"
* run shelxpro to obtain .ins file from .pdb file; a ligand may require the "J" option
* run shelxpro to obtain .ins file from .pdb file; a ligand may require the "J" option
* use "CGLS x y" refinement until convergence; the final run should be "CGLS x" only.
* use "CGLS x y" refinement until convergence; the last run should be "CGLS x" only.
* a final job to get standard uncertainties (s.u., formerly e.s.d.) on all geometric parameters (see Q21 in "FAQs: Macromolecules"):
* a final job to get standard uncertainties (s.u., formerly e.s.d.) on all geometric parameters (see Q21 in "FAQs: Macromolecules"):
** change CGLS x y to REM CGLS x y
** change CGLS x y to REM CGLS x y
** insert lines L.S. 1, DAMP 0 0 and BLOC 1 (or e.g. BLOC N_1 > LAST )
** insert lines L.S. 1, DAMP 0 0 and BLOC 1 (or e.g. BLOC N_1 > LAST )
** remove all restraints: lines begining with SIMU, DELU, ISOR, BUMP, DFIX, DANG, CHIV, FLAT (from "Mini-protein refinement tutorial"). (Editor's) Note a): NCSY then should also be removed, right? b) all of this is only useful for high-resolution work (let's say 1.4 A). At low to medium resolution my question would rather be: what are the s.u. on distances between these atoms, given that these atoms are covalently bound to other atoms, and are thus restrained?  
** remove all restraints: lines begining with SIMU, DELU, ISOR, BUMP, DFIX, DANG, CHIV, FLAT (from "Mini-protein refinement tutorial"). (Editor's) Note a): NCSY then should also be removed, right? b) all of this is only useful for high-resolution work (let's say 1.4 A). At low to medium resolution my typical question would rather be: what are the s.u. on distances between atoms x and y, given that these atoms are covalently bound to other atoms, and are thus restrained? In other words, I would keep all geometric restraints and ask "how much is the s.u. on this distance based on crystallographic data (reflections to some resolution) for this model (with its R-factor, B-factors and restraints)?".
** BOND, RTAB, HTAB and MPLA instructions may be needed to define the dependent parameters for which esds are required (from "FAQs: Macromolecules"). As an example, BIND FE_5001 NE2_123 together with BOND FE_5001 NE2_123 would enter the distance between FE_5001 and NE2_123 into the connectivity table, and would print out the distance and its s.u. in the .lst file.
** BOND, RTAB, HTAB and MPLA instructions may be needed to define the dependent parameters for which esds are required (from "FAQs: Macromolecules"). As an example, BIND FE_5001 NE2_123 together with BOND FE_5001 NE2_123 would enter the distance between FE_5001 and NE2_123 into the connectivity table, and would print out the distance and its s.u. into the .lst file.
1,328

edits