MINIMUM ZETA: Difference between revisions

MINIMUM ZETA (view source)

9 bytes removed , 5 December 2007

m

2,660

edits

Revision as of 13:12, 17 November 2007 (view source) Kay (talk \| contribs) mNo edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 23:01, 5 December 2007 (view source) Kay (talk \| contribs) m (→‎An example) Newer edit →
Line 81:		Line 81:
	[[Image:ms688-frame.png]]		[[Image:ms688-frame.png]]

	From looking at rf.pck of many datasets, it is my experience that at the SLS (X06SA~~, Pilatus detector~~), the R-factors along the spindle are better than perpendicular to it, which is quite surprising (and should be investigated). Therefore it is clear that in particular for these data it is a good thing to decrease MINIMUM_ZETA because accurately measured reflections are added to the data set.		From looking at rf.pck of many datasets, it is my experience that at the SLS (beamline X06SA), the R-factors along the spindle are better than perpendicular to it, which is quite surprising (and should be investigated). Therefore it is clear that in particular for these data it is a good thing to decrease MINIMUM_ZETA because accurately measured reflections are added to the data set.