2,684
edits
Tips and Tricks: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
→SAD/MAD data reduction
mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Run CORRECT twice, with STRICT_ABSORPTION_CORRECTION=TRUE and STRICT_ABSORPTION_CORRECTION=FALSE, and compare the results. I find that the anomalous signal in SeMet-SAD/MAD is significantly enhanced in the "Anomal Corr" and the "SigAno" disciplines with STRICT_ABSORPTION_CORRECTION=TRUE (which used to be the default in older versions but is ''not the default since Version May 8, 2007''). | Run CORRECT twice, with STRICT_ABSORPTION_CORRECTION=TRUE and STRICT_ABSORPTION_CORRECTION=FALSE, and compare the results. I find that the anomalous signal in SeMet-SAD/MAD is significantly enhanced in the "Anomal Corr" and the "SigAno" disciplines with STRICT_ABSORPTION_CORRECTION=TRUE (which used to be the default in older versions but is ''not the default since Version May 8, 2007''). | ||
Example: 269 frames, 0.5°/frame, F222; STRICT_ABSORPTION_CORRECTION=TRUE | Example: 269 frames, 0.5°/frame, F222; SeMet; high remote; STRICT_ABSORPTION_CORRECTION=TRUE: | ||
SUBSET OF INTENSITY DATA WITH SIGNAL/NOISE >= -3.0 AS FUNCTION OF RESOLUTION | SUBSET OF INTENSITY DATA WITH SIGNAL/NOISE >= -3.0 AS FUNCTION OF RESOLUTION | ||