Low dose data: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
change text to use DATA_RANGE_FIXED_SCALE_FACTOR instead of FIXED_SCALE_FACTOR
No edit summary
(change text to use DATA_RANGE_FIXED_SCALE_FACTOR instead of FIXED_SCALE_FACTOR)
Line 3: Line 3:
With the current version of XDS, the background of a data frame is used for scaling adjacent frames relative to each other in the INTEGRATE step.
With the current version of XDS, the background of a data frame is used for scaling adjacent frames relative to each other in the INTEGRATE step.


This seems to work very well down to an average of 0.5 counts/pixel. If, however, the crystal is exposed so shortly/weakly that the average drops significantly below this value, scaling becomes impossible - the ratio of averages which are around zero is obviously undefined. The keyword [http://homes.mpimf-heidelberg.mpg.de/~kabsch/xds/html_doc/xds_parameters.html#FIXED_SCALE_FACTOR= FIXED_SCALE_FACTOR] has been introduced to handle this situation.
This seems to work very well down to an average of 0.5 counts/pixel. If, however, the crystal is exposed so shortly/weakly that the average drops significantly below this value, scaling becomes impossible - the ratio of averages which are around zero is obviously undefined. The keyword [http://homes.mpimf-heidelberg.mpg.de/~kabsch/xds/html_doc/xds_parameters.html#DATA_RANGE_FIXED_SCALE_FACTOR== DATA_RANGE_FIXED_SCALE_FACTOR] has been introduced to handle this situation.


Another problem is that below 0.5 counts/pixel, the I/sigma values become overly optimistic. Whether this is due to the intensities being too high or the sigmas too low has not yet been investigated; likely it's the latter. This effect is ''not'' mitigated by use of [http://homes.mpimf-heidelberg.mpg.de/~kabsch/xds/html_doc/xds_parameters.html#FIXED_SCALE_FACTOR= FIXED_SCALE_FACTOR] .  
Another problem is that below 0.5 counts/pixel, the I/sigma values become overly optimistic. Whether this is due to the intensities being too high or the sigmas too low has not yet been investigated; likely it's the latter. This effect is ''not'' mitigated by use of [http://homes.mpimf-heidelberg.mpg.de/~kabsch/xds/html_doc/xds_parameters.html#DATA_RANGE_FIXED_SCALE_FACTOR= DATA_RANGE_FIXED_SCALE_FACTOR] .  


CC1/2 (printed out in CORRECT.LP since version of March 15, 2012), on the other hand, appears to be more realistic.
CC1/2 (printed out in CORRECT.LP since version of March 15, 2012), on the other hand, appears to be more realistic.
2,652

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.

Navigation menu