2,684
edits
Problems: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Things to watch out for in IDXREF.LP
(→IDXREF ends with !!! ERROR !!! message: remedy for case of too short axis, and difference vectors being halved) |
|||
| Line 119: | Line 119: | ||
and then continue to run XDS. In other cases you may want to change SPOT.XDS, or other keywords in [[XDS.INP]] (see also below). But in any case this is an important alert that should make you check the correctness of the parameters that describe the data collection (X-RAY_WAVELENGTH, DETECTOR_DISTANCE, ORGX, ORGY, OSCILLATION_RANGE, NAME_TEMPLATE_OF_DATA_FRAMES). | and then continue to run XDS. In other cases you may want to change SPOT.XDS, or other keywords in [[XDS.INP]] (see also below). But in any case this is an important alert that should make you check the correctness of the parameters that describe the data collection (X-RAY_WAVELENGTH, DETECTOR_DISTANCE, ORGX, ORGY, OSCILLATION_RANGE, NAME_TEMPLATE_OF_DATA_FRAMES). | ||
=== | === IDXREF produces too short cell parameter(s) === | ||
The first table "CLUSTER COORDINATES AND INDICES WITH RESPECT TO REC. LATTICE BASIS VECTORS" should show close-to-integer difference vectors. The following is an example how it should ''not'' look like: | The first table "CLUSTER COORDINATES AND INDICES WITH RESPECT TO REC. LATTICE BASIS VECTORS" should show close-to-integer difference vectors. The following is an example how it should ''not'' look like: | ||