Eiger: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
87 bytes added ,  13 March 2016
(→‎A benchmark: add CBF timings)
Line 33: Line 33:
so there's still some room for improvement.
so there's still some room for improvement.


With program versions as of 2016-03-10, miniCBF is practically as fast as H5ToXds binary; hdf2mini-cbf is somewhat slower.
With program versions as of 2016-03-10, miniCBF-Linux is practically as fast as the H5ToXds binary; hdf2mini-cbf is somewhat slower.


When unpacking the .h5 files to .cbf files and processing those, I get (on the same machine and with same processing parameters) on three successive runs:
When unpacking the .h5 files to .cbf files and processing those, I get (on the same machine and with same processing parameters) on three successive runs:
Line 39: Line 39:
  Total elapsed wall-clock time for XDS      110.7 sec
  Total elapsed wall-clock time for XDS      110.7 sec
  Total elapsed wall-clock time for XDS      111.1 sec
  Total elapsed wall-clock time for XDS      111.1 sec
which indicates a 8% overhead due to the HDF5-to-CBF conversion.
which indicates a 8% overhead due to the HDF5-to-CBF conversion. The latter 3 timings do not include the time for the HDF5-to-CBF conversion.


== Troubleshooting ==
== Troubleshooting ==
2,684

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.

Navigation menu