54
edits
DeltaCC12: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Δcc12 is a quantity, that detects datasets/frames, that are non-isomorphous. As described in [https://scripts.iucr.org/cgi-bin/paper?zw5005 Assmann and Diederichs (2016)], Δcc12 is calculated with the σ-τ method. This method is a way to calculate the Pearson correlation coefficient for the special case of two sets of values (intensities) that randomly deviate from their true values, but is not influenced by a random number sequence as shown in [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3457925/ Karplus and Diederichs (2012)]. | Δcc12 is a quantity, that detects datasets/frames, that are non-isomorphous. As described in [https://scripts.iucr.org/cgi-bin/paper?zw5005 Assmann and Diederichs (2016)], Δcc12 is calculated with the σ-τ method. This method is a way to calculate the Pearson correlation coefficient for the special case of two sets of values (intensities) that randomly deviate from their true values, but is not influenced by a random number sequence as shown in [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3457925/ Karplus and Diederichs (2012)]. For the σ-τ method CC12 is calculated for all datasets/frames, which will be called CC12_overall (?) and CC12 is calculated for all datasets/frames except for one dataset i, which is omitted from calculations and denoted as CC12_i. The difference of the two quantities is Δcc12. | ||
: <math>\Delta CC_{1/2}= CC_{1/2 overall}-CC_{1/2 i} </math> | |||
If Δcc12 is > 0 -CC12overall is bigger than CC12i- that means if omitting dataset i from calculations, a lower CC12 results, which is why we want to keep it. Thus it is improving the whole merged dataset. If Δcc12 is < 0, -CC12overall is smaller than CC12i- that means that by omitting dataset i from calculations a higher CC12 results, which is why we want to exclude it from calculations, because it is impairing the whole merged dataset. CC12 is calculated by: | |||
: <math>CC_{1/2}=\frac{\sigma^2_{\tau}}{\sigma^2_{\tau}+\sigma^2_{\epsilon}} =\frac{\sigma^2_{y}- \frac{1}{2}\sigma^2_{\epsilon}}{\sigma^2_{ | : <math>CC_{1/2}=\frac{\sigma^2_{\tau}}{\sigma^2_{\tau}+\sigma^2_{\epsilon}} =\frac{\sigma^2_{y}- \frac{1}{2}\sigma^2_{\epsilon}}{\sigma^2_{y}+ \frac{1}{2}\sigma^2_{\epsilon}} </math> | ||
This requires calculation of <math>\sigma^2_{y} </math>, the variance of the average intensities across the unique reflections of a resolution shell, and <math>\sigma^2_{\epsilon} </math>, the average of all sample variances of the mean across all unique reflections of a resolution shell. | |||
== Implementation == | == Implementation == | ||
For Implementation the different formulas are displayed: | |||
===''' <math>\sigma^2_{y} </math>'''=== | |||
The unbiased sample variance from all averaged intensities of all unique reflections is calculated by: | |||
<math>\sigma^2_{y} = \frac{1}{n-1} \cdot \left ( \sum^n_{i} x^2_i - \frac{\left ( \sum^n_{i}x_{i} \right )^2}{ n} \right ) </math> | |||
With <math>x_{i} </math> , average intensity of a unique reflection i. This is done for all reflections n in a resolution shell. | |||