Eiger: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
46 bytes added ,  27 February 2021
(→‎A benchmark: remove - too old)
Line 657: Line 657:
which indicates a 24% overhead due to the HDF5-to-CBF conversion. However, one has to add to this the time for the HDF5-to-CBF conversion, which is (with 18 parallel H5ToXds jobs each converting 50 frames) 34.2 sec, so overall the "on-the-fly" route using the script below is faster than the "pre-conversion" route, at least on this machine.
which indicates a 24% overhead due to the HDF5-to-CBF conversion. However, one has to add to this the time for the HDF5-to-CBF conversion, which is (with 18 parallel H5ToXds jobs each converting 50 frames) 34.2 sec, so overall the "on-the-fly" route using the script below is faster than the "pre-conversion" route, at least on this machine.


== A script for faster XDS processing of CBF-converted Eiger data ==
== A script for faster XDS processing of CBF-converted Eiger data (this is only shown out of historic interest) ==
<pre>
<pre>
#!/bin/bash
#!/bin/bash
2,684

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.

Navigation menu