Problems: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No change in size ,  10 March 2022
no edit summary
(→‎64bit binary on a 32bit operating system: remove section about 32bit, and create new "frame numbers beyond 999999")
No edit summary
Line 57: Line 57:
     bash: export KMP_INIT_AT_FORK=FALSE
     bash: export KMP_INIT_AT_FORK=FALSE
     tcsh: setenv KMP_INIT_AT_FORK FALSE
     tcsh: setenv KMP_INIT_AT_FORK FALSE
=== frame numbers beyond 999999 ===
If the number of question marks "?" in NAME_TEMPLATE_OF_DATA_FRAMES is larger than 6, to allow for e.g.
DATA_RANGE= 1000001 10001000
then IDXREF cannot properly read SPOT.XDS written by COLSPOT, and stops with
  !!! ERROR !!! CANNOT READ SPOT.XDS
This happens when the filenames of the frames have digits before the actual number, as in myframe1000001.cbf .
The workaround is to specify e.g.
NAME_TEMPLATE_OF_DATA_FRAMES=myframe100????.cbf
DATA_RANGE=1 1000
(Problem reported by Pedro Dinis)


=== ASSERT VIOLATION ===
=== ASSERT VIOLATION ===
Line 265: Line 252:


A final possibility: your crystal may really be triclinic - hopefully you collected 180° of data, or even a bit more than that.
A final possibility: your crystal may really be triclinic - hopefully you collected 180° of data, or even a bit more than that.
=== frame numbers beyond 999999 ===
If the number of question marks "?" in NAME_TEMPLATE_OF_DATA_FRAMES is larger than 6, to allow for e.g.
DATA_RANGE= 1000001 10001000
then IDXREF cannot properly read SPOT.XDS written by COLSPOT, and stops with
  !!! ERROR !!! CANNOT READ SPOT.XDS
This happens when the filenames of the frames have digits before the actual number, as in myframe1000001.cbf .
The workaround is to specify e.g.
NAME_TEMPLATE_OF_DATA_FRAMES=myframe100????.cbf
DATA_RANGE=1 1000
(Problem reported by Pedro Dinis)


== Integration failure ==
== Integration failure ==
2,684

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.

Navigation menu