2,684
edits
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
== SAD/MAD data reduction == | == SAD/MAD data reduction == | ||
With FRIEDEL'S_LAW=FALSE, run CORRECT twice, with STRICT_ABSORPTION_CORRECTION=TRUE and STRICT_ABSORPTION_CORRECTION=FALSE, and compare the results. I find that the anomalous signal in SeMet-SAD/MAD is significantly enhanced in the "Anomal Corr" and the "SigAno" disciplines with STRICT_ABSORPTION_CORRECTION=TRUE (which used to be the default in older versions but is ''not the default since Version May 8, 2007''). | |||
Example: 269 frames, 0.5°/frame, F222; SeMet; high remote; STRICT_ABSORPTION_CORRECTION=TRUE: | Example: 269 frames, 0.5°/frame, F222; SeMet; high remote; STRICT_ABSORPTION_CORRECTION=TRUE: |